Under continuous attack by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) said the summit between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the KMT shows that the KMT is "harboring malicious intentions" to sidestep Taiwan's elected government. A few weeks ago, Chen's approval ratings plunged to an unprecedented low of 18 percent. According to one poll, he had to rely on KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou's (馬英九) goodwill gesture when he decided to meet with Chen to give that number a boost.
The main reason the Chen administration has been reduced to this is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government has achieved nothing, despite commanding the state apparatus and its massive administrative resources. Ever since the DPP came to power, there has been talk of DPP politicians taking money without doing anything. In the KMT era, KMT politicians also took money but they were actually able to fix problems.
Upon first hearing these rumors, I did not really believe my ears. I wondered how those attempting to grease the palms of government officials could tolerate getting nothing in return. The scandal that will likely lead to the indictment of former Presidential Office deputy secretary-general Chen Che-nan (
But there are many DPP politicians who take money and do nothing, or fail to do their jobs properly. These are not corrupt officials but they receive high salaries and generous retirement allowances, legally. Although it can't be called corruption, it is more frightening, because they are the ones who have paralyzed the execution of government policy. They are not people with nothing to do, rather they are so busy that they get nothing done properly.
Taking money and doing nothing, or doing nothing right, reflects an inability to rule, problems with decisionmaking and administrative efficiency and an inability to deal with the unification/independence issue. In short, the DPP is incapable of governing despite having had six years to learn. The major offender, of course, is Chen Shui-bian. Despite the power and resources at his disposal, and regardless of which officials he chooses, his decisions have been inconsistent and unwise. One example is the constant attempt to coordinate the relationship between the Presidential Office, the Cabinet and the DPP. Now, they have almost come full circle, returning to an arrangement similar to that when the DPP took power.
The gravest problem with the Chen administration is that it fails to take a good hard look in the mirror. In particular, the president behaves almost as the KMT did during the Martial Law era, suppressing every call for reform. Prior to last year's local government elections, young DPP politicians openly asked the party's leadership for reforms, but were suppressed.
What's worse, Chen Shui-bian has instead highlighted his contributions to the party and railed against those who have withdrawn from the DPP. Ever since he became president, Chen has paid lip service to self-reflection, yet has done nothing of the kind -- not even the formal kind of review that the KMT used to engage in. Maybe the key is that President Chen's personnel choices and decision making do not allow for true reviews. There is no way he will acknowledge a need for reform. A government incapable of self reflection, given a few years to rule, will become more and more impotent.
Most people, including DPP politicians, no longer seem to pin their hopes on the president. The problem of people taking money without doing anything will likely not be solved during the two remaining years of Chen's tenure, and the government will continue to do nothing until it loses its hold on power.
Chen Shui-bian and the DPP government have been given power by voters, and they should make an effort to do something for the country and the Taiwanese people. I still hope that Chen Shui-bian and the government will demonstrate determination, take a good long look at themselves and make a valuable contribution to Taiwan.
Chiu Hei-yuan is the research fellow of the Institute of Sociology at the Academia Sinica.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) concludes his fourth visit to China since leaving office, Taiwan finds itself once again trapped in a familiar cycle of political theater. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has criticized Ma’s participation in the Straits Forum as “dancing with Beijing,” while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) defends it as an act of constitutional diplomacy. Both sides miss a crucial point: The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world. The disagreement reduces Taiwan’s
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is visiting China, where he is addressed in a few ways, but never as a former president. On Sunday, he attended the Straits Forum in Xiamen, not as a former president of Taiwan, but as a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman. There, he met with Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧). Presumably, Wang at least would have been aware that Ma had once been president, and yet he did not mention that fact, referring to him only as “Mr Ma Ying-jeou.” Perhaps the apparent oversight was not intended to convey a lack of