Oil prices jumped from a low point of US$22 a barrel in 2002 to a new high above US$70 a barrel last week.
This rising trend has caused bus and plane ticket prices to go up. This time last year, a one-way air ticket from Chicago to Washington only cost US$198. Now, that same ticket costs US$339.
Some blame the price hikes of the past few years on the US-Iraq war, and see last year's hikes as being a result of Hurricane Katrina.
However, the real structural reason is that international demand for oil outstrips supply, and newly-discovered oil volume is lower than forecast future needs.
According to the International Energy Agency, global demand for crude oil outgrew crude supplies last year.
After the annual global surpluses of the past, we have now entered a more difficult era when supply will fall short of demand.
Oil production has already set a new high: 1,000 barrels per second, or 86 million barrels per day. Perhaps these figures are hard to grasp.
Let us imagine it in another way: The crude we pump would fill an Olympic-sized swimming pool in just 15 seconds, and we consume a total of 5,500 pools of oil per day.
Since oil prices are still climbing, strong demand should, in theory, stimulate production.
However, crude is not a regenerative resource. It is not like water, easily available whenever we turn on the faucet.
Unfortunately, most oil fields that are easily harvested are old and have run dry.
Areas that are easy to explore have also been thoroughly tapped.
Rising prices drive geologists to even tougher environments in search of "black gold" -- from the 42oC burning desert of Saudi Arabia, to the extremely windy northern Siberia and the guerrilla-controlled tropical jungles of West Africa, to the deep seas.
Exploration in such tough environments, as well as pumping oil and shipping it over long distances all require a lot of money.
Today, oil exploration and shipping costs are as high as US$20 per barrel. These investments are highly risky, and take longer to show a profit.
Under such circumstances, how can oil prices come down?
The imbalance in energy supply and demand, as well as price hikes for various types of energy and goods, are pushing the world toward a critical point.
Control over sources of oil is related to each country's economic development and the battle for them is crucial to international relations.
The drawing of an exclusive economic zone in a country's sea territory also concerns its rights to oil sources in that area.
All these issues spell out a new framework for international diplomacy and geopolitics.
With all oil wells set to dry out eventually, research institutes are silently developing new technologies to find a replacement source of energy. Perhaps a new Thomas Edison or Bill Gates is doing research somewhere out there.
The potential for shortages of energy sparking wars over limited energy resources is a frightening prospect.
But new inventions and new energy technologies are also likely to be implemented. We have to act cautiously.
We should not worry over whether Chinese Petroleum Corp will raise its oil prices next week.
Rather, we should worry about whether Taiwan has a lasting oil policy.
Wei Kuo-yen is a professor in the department of geosciences at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
A chip made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) was found on a Huawei Technologies Co artificial intelligence (AI) processor, indicating a possible breach of US export restrictions that have been in place since 2019 on sensitive tech to the Chinese firm and others. The incident has triggered significant concern in the IT industry, as it appears that proxy buyers are acting on behalf of restricted Chinese companies to bypass the US rules, which are intended to protect its national security. Canada-based research firm TechInsights conducted a die analysis of the Huawei Ascend 910B AI Trainer, releasing its findings on Oct.
Pat Gelsinger took the reins as Intel CEO three years ago with hopes of reviving the US industrial icon. He soon made a big mistake. Intel had a sweet deal going with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), the giant manufacturer of semiconductors for other companies. TSMC would make chips that Intel designed, but could not produce and was offering deep discounts to Intel, four people with knowledge of the agreement said. Instead of nurturing the relationship, Gelsinger — who hoped to restore Intel’s own manufacturing prowess — offended TSMC by calling out Taiwan’s precarious relations with China. “You don’t want all of
In honor of President Jimmy Carter’s 100th birthday, my longtime friend and colleague John Tkacik wrote an excellent op-ed reassessing Carter’s derecognition of Taipei. But I would like to add my own thoughts on this often-misunderstood president. During Carter’s single term as president of the United States from 1977 to 1981, despite numerous foreign policy and domestic challenges, he is widely recognized for brokering the historic 1978 Camp David Accords that ended the state of war between Egypt and Israel after more than three decades of hostilities. It is considered one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of the 20th century.
In a recent essay in Foreign Affairs, titled “The Upside on Uncertainty in Taiwan,” Johns Hopkins University professor James B. Steinberg makes the argument that the concept of strategic ambiguity has kept a tenuous peace across the Taiwan Strait. In his piece, Steinberg is primarily countering the arguments of Tufts University professor Sulmaan Wasif Khan, who in his thought-provoking new book The Struggle for Taiwan does some excellent out-of-the-box thinking looking at US policy toward Taiwan from 1943 on, and doing some fascinating “what if?” exercises. Reading through Steinberg’s comments, and just starting to read Khan’s book, we could already sense that