During his 10-day trip to the US which concludes today, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) took advantage of his popularity as Taiwan's leading candidate for the next presidential election by elaborating on his concept of "Five Dos" to construct a framework for talks between Taiwan and China.
The policy calls for the resumption of talks on the basis of the so-called "1992 consensus," in which Taiwan and China supposedly agree that there is "one China" but agree to disagree on what that means. Based on that "mutual understanding," Ma would seek an interim agreement that would "formally terminate the state of hostility across the Taiwan Strait and enable the two sides to interact with each other in peace" for 30 to 50 years.
Ma also called for the normalization of economic relations with Beijing, increased Taiwanese participation in international affairs, and increased cross-strait cultural and educational exchanges. Above all, Ma would seek to maintain the cross-strait "status quo."
A careful look at Ma's much-publicized US visit reveals that it was intended to construct an image of a moderate and peace-loving leader. He repeatedly talked about how he could do a better job than President Chen Shui-bian's (
While Ma was happy to attrib-ute the recent cross-strait tension to Chen's decision to cease the functions of the National Unification Council and its guidelines, he avoided apportioning any blame to Beijing despite its missile threat. By repeatedly accusing the Chen administration of "rocking the boat," Ma portrayed himself as the only person capable of talking Beijing into accepting Taiwan as an independent, sovereign state.
On the question of why the pan-blue camp continues to boycott the arms procurement bill, Ma could conceivably offer excuses that he was taking into account Taiwan's actual defense requirements, its economic situation, the public's opinion, as well as the impact the procurement would have on cross-strait relations. In this way, he might be able to persuade the Bush administration that the current bill was unsatisfactory, without offering an alternative KMT package. In any event, Washington has not publicly expressed its dissatisfaction with Ma's failure to come up with a straight answer.
Since Taiwan's representative to the US, David Lee (
There is no doubt that, as an image-building exercise, Ma's US trip was a success. For Taiwan, however, it was a failure. It is shameful that as the leader of Taiwan's largest opposition party, Ma worked to humiliate Taiwan's elected president while he was abroad. He also downplayed the China threat and sought to focus attention on himself.
Ma's lack of integrity and courage to defend Taiwanese democracy against China's military intimidation and missile threats, as well as his deceitful attempts to frame future cross-strait negotiations around the non-existent "1992 consensus," suggests that he does not have what it takes to be a national leader.
Local media should refrain from dancing to Ma's tune and seek instead to reveal the lack of substance behind his dazzling facade. Otherwise, Taiwan risks electing a leader who is "full of sound and fury, signifying nothing."
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
I wrote this before US President Donald Trump embarked on his uneventful state visit to China on Thursday. So, I shall confine my observations to the joint US-Philippine military exercise of April 20 through May 8, known collectively as “Balikatan 2026.” This year’s Balikatan was notable for its “firsts.” First, it was conducted primarily with Taiwan in mind, not the Philippines or even the South China Sea. It also showed that in the Pacific, America’s alliance network is still robust. Allies are enthusiastic about America’s renewed leadership in the region. Nine decades ago, in 1936, America had neither military strength