Whether or not Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
Direct links -- Ma's promised first priority -- can only be established if Taiwan's government agrees that these links are domestic, not international, which would make it very difficult for Ma to defend Taiwan's sovereignty. And by the time Ma and Beijing finish with any mutual peace agreement -- which incidentally can only be achieved by means of Taiwan's unilateral de facto disarmament and the criminalization of the Taiwan independence movement -- the "status quo" would become utterly meaningless.
Maintaining the "status quo" in the Taiwan Strait based on the "one China" policy over the next few years could eventually rank among the worst fiascos in the annals of US foreign policy.
It could serve as one of the prime lessons on how the failure to update a policy can allow a golden opportunity to pass. Most of the officials at the US State Department might even reflect fondly on President Chen Shui-bian's (
Still, nostalgia would be the kind of luxury only US officials and people outside of Taiwan can afford.
Similar arguments can be made with respect to the current debate raging in US academic circles regarding the necessity of containing Chinese military expansion in the context of US regional strategy -- with Taiwan unavoidably being drawn into the discussion.
The standard comment pro-Beijing academics provide regarding the possibility of China allowing Ma to maintain Taiwan's status as a de facto sovereign state is that Beijing would bend over backwards to accommodate Ma and therefore would be flexible with preconditions for various cross-strait dealings.
This would be in spite of the fact that, in the context of Taiwan's status, China's leadership would only be accommodating to the extent of allowing Ma to apply his infamous KMT logic to muddle the truth with the intention of pacifying the people of Taiwan.
But trusting China's leaders to behave with flexibility, which is counter to their instincts and most definitely violates their "Anti-Secession" Law regarding Taiwan's sovereignty, is a luxury the Taiwanese people can't afford either.
Perhaps what the people of Taiwan can least afford is pan-blue leaders whose constant whetting of Beijing's appetite is to a large extent responsible for the predicament Taiwan is now facing in terms of annexation pressure. This is not to mention the governmental gridlock caused by the extreme obstructionism that has been practiced by the pan-blue majority in the Legislative Yuan for six years.
But relief could arrive from an unlikely source.
Reportedly, in conjunction with "the economic development on the west shore of the Taiwan Strait in Fujian" as quoted from a speech given by Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (
The project would encourage Taiwanese politicians with Fujianese ancestry to take residence in Fujian in order to engage in political activities and take advantage of opportunities for positions such as NPC representatives or even provincial deputy chief and county deputy chiefs, all to be specifically allocated to promote such activities.
This is ostensibly designed to dilute and willfully undermine Taiwan's sovereignty. A closer examination, however, would reveal that the project could hold potential merit if Beijing is willing to expand it with "fairness" in mind.
For instance, copying the "Fujian-Taiwan Special Zone" model, Beijing could set up a "Hunan-Taiwan Special Zone," "Zhejiang-Taiwan Special Zone" etc -- as many as China has provinces. Only by doing this could Beijing avoid shortchanging those "one China"-aspiring pan-blue leaders with ancestral lineage in provinces other than Fujian.
In the past, a number of pan-blue leaders wailed that the potential for development of a small island like Taiwan was simply too limited. Apparently, they were lamenting Taiwan's limited market for politicians, among other shortcomings.
If Beijing could rename part of each of China's provinces that respective province's "Taiwan Special Zone" to accommodate all those Chinese-at-heart politicians from Taiwan, the cross-strait impasse as well as Taiwan's relentless internal struggle would be halfway resolved.
Naturally, Taiwanese voters can always -- at least up to 2008 -- have the option of accomplishing this by wielding the power of their ballots instead of awaiting the improbable.
Huang Jei-hsuan
California
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
In an eloquently written piece published on Sunday, French-Taiwanese education and policy consultant Ninon Godefroy presents an interesting take on the Taiwanese character, as viewed from the eyes of an — at least partial — outsider. She muses that the non-assuming and quiet efficiency of a particularly Taiwanese approach to life and work is behind the global success stories of two very different Taiwanese institutions: Din Tai Fung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). Godefroy said that it is this “humble” approach that endears the nation to visitors, over and above any big ticket attractions that other countries may have
A media report has suggested that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was considering initiating a vote of no confidence in Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) in a bid to “bring down the Cabinet.” The KMT has denied that this topic was ever discussed. Why might such a move have even be considered? It would have been absurd if it had seen the light of day — potentially leading to a mass loss of legislative seats for the KMT even without the recall petitions already under way. Today the second phase of the recall movement is to begin — which has
RSS