Democracy pioneer and liberal Lei Chen (雷震) believed that human rights were paramount. He thought that sentiment toward the nation should be closely connected to the implementation of human rights and democracy, and that human rights and democracy should not be sacrificed for nationalism.
Hence, when the external situation changed for Taiwan, especially when the "communist bandits" -- the People's Republic of China (PRC) -- received international recognition, Lei changed his position on Taiwan's status.
After his release from prison in 1970 -- he served 10 years for publishing a magazine that promoted democracy -- Lei immediately recognized there was a lack of support in the international community for the Republic of China's (ROC) "one China" view.
Support for the PRC as the legal representative of China had entered the mainstream. Given these circumstances, although he was closely monitored by intelligence agents, Lei managed to give an interview to the Washington Post in 1971 where he clearly advocated "two Chinas." But in October of that year, the UN passed a proposal by Albania, which trans-ferred the ROC's right to represent China to the PRC.
On Jan. 10, 1972, Lei spoke with five top government leaders, including then president Chiang Kai-shek (
In his proposal, Lei demanded that the nation's name be changed to the Democratic State of China-Taiwan (中華台灣民主國), saying that it would only be just and proper for Taiwan to be transformed into a country. He demanded that those in power abandon the myth of the ROC because it betrayed the three elements required to achieve national status according to traditional political science -- the possession of territory, people and sovereignty. He called on the leadership to give up its claim to sovereignty over China.
He also urged the government to host meetings to create a new constitution for the Democratic State of China-Taiwan, in order to realize freedom and democracy.
Based on his understanding that "one China" referred to the PRC, Lei was afraid that because Taiwan was ruled by the ROC -- which had lost the right to represent China in the international community -- the PRC would claim that as the successor government to the ROC, it had the right to Taiwan. To avoid this threat to Taiwan's survival, Lei proposed an independent Taiwan, separate from the PRC, as a way to perpetuate its status as a sovereign state.
Those who believe in freedom and democracy but who also harbor feelings for China, should consider Lei's view.
Given that Chinese nationalism and the universal values of freedom and democracy are incompatible at this time, the reasonable solution should be to abandon Chinese nationalism to protect freedom and democracy in Taiwan.
Hsueh Hua-yuan is a professor in the Graduate Institute of Taiwan History at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS