I WAS SURFING the Internet the other day when I heard a giant sucking sound coming from the Web site of Australia's main national newspaper.
The sound was similar to that of two puckered lips engaged in a lengthy smooch, and it was emanating from my computer because the paper in question, the Australian, had its mouth surgically attached to the posterior of Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
From a March 4 article about President Chen Shui-bian (
Now I don't take issue with Chen being called a nerd (the man refers to himself in the third person, for heaven's sake). But why dub Ma the JFK of the KMT?
Look, they both went to Harvard, but that's as far as the comparison will take us. Kennedy was a decisive leader who stood eyeball to eyeball with Nikita Khrushchev over Cuban missiles in 1962, risking global nuclear war, and won. Ma's an indecisive bureaucrat who stood eyeball to eyeball with the betel nut girls of Taipei City over their scanty attire in 1999, risking the sight of bare flesh, and won.
So I say until Ma (1) has an affair with the Taiwanese equivalent of Marilyn Monroe, and (2) rearms KMT veterans and sends them off to invade China (a la the Bay of Pigs), he doesn't qualify for the JFK title.
Then again, the way that the KMT celebrated Women's Day definitely had a 1960s feel to it. The party asked women to make wishes to a statue of Ma on its Web site, with the promise that the woman who asked for the "most original" wish would have it granted by the Taipei mayor himself. This, the KMT felt, was an appropriate way to celebrate the achievements of women. By having them beg for favors at the feet of an effete lawyer. How progressive.
But women weren't allowing themselves to be trivialized by everyone in Taiwan. On the contrary, the Central News Agency reported on March 6, in a story titled "Number of Taiwanese seeking jobs in China growing rapidly," that: "The survey [by a recruiting firm] also shows that among those who are willing to work in China, men accounted for 72 percent, but women for only 20 percent." Yet more statistical evidence that women are, in fact, smarter than men.
Just look at microbiologist Jane Lin (林惠嘉), who happens to be married to Ang Lee (李安). She supported the budding director for six years while he was waiting for his big break. Describing their relationship to the TV station CTI, she said simply: "I did not support him, I just left him alone."
China, too, can claim never to have supported Ang Lee, but it can't claim to have left him alone.
It isn't often that I am willing to dole out praise to a news agency, but I am glad that Reuters on March 7 picked up the story about China's hypersensitive censors cutting Ang Lee's Oscar acceptance speech from their coverage. According to the report, even as the Das Reich of the Chinese Communist Party, the China Daily, gushed that "Ang Lee is the pride of the Chinese people all over the world," it also "cut the part of his speech in which he thanked everyone in Taiwan, China and Hong Kong."
I guess they objected because he didn't call Taiwan a province. But it shouldn't really be a problem, considering it's illegal to play Brokeback Mountain in Chinese theaters anyway. I guess that's how you show appreciation to the pride of the Chinese people.
Don't worry, though. If such commie antics rile you up, you can join the mass protest on March 18 to celebrate Anti-Aggression Day.
I have but one question: Anti-Aggression Day? Is that the best we can do?
How about something with a more positive spin, like "Release-Aggression Day"? We could all burn Chinese flags and stomp on pictures of Hu Jintao (
Or we could try "Passive-Aggression Day."
According to an authoritative source (random Web site) discovered by my research staff (Google), passive aggression is "characterized by habitual passive resistance to demands for adequate performance in occupational or social situations, as by procrastination, stubbornness, sullenness and inefficiency."
"Passive resistance to demands for adequate performance?" I'd say former Council of Labor Affairs chairwoman Chen Chu (
I hereby dub the first Monday after the fourth Tuesday of every month official "Passive-Aggression Day."
Unfortunately, I'm not really sure what celebrating this day will entail, and if you ask me for details I'll refuse to answer you.
(Final note: There was a technical glitch with my e-mail account last week. It has been sorted out now.)
Heard or read something particularly objectionable about Taiwan? Johnny wants to know: dearjohnny@taipeitimes.com is the place to reach me, with "Dear Johnny" in the subject line.
In a stark reminder of China’s persistent territorial overreach, Pema Wangjom Thongdok, a woman from Arunachal Pradesh holding an Indian passport, was detained for 18 hours at Shanghai Pudong Airport on Nov. 24 last year. Chinese immigration officials allegedly informed her that her passport was “invalid” because she was “Chinese,” refusing to recognize her Indian citizenship and claiming Arunachal Pradesh as part of South Tibet. Officials had insisted that Thongdok, an Indian-origin UK resident traveling for a conference, was not Indian despite her valid documents. India lodged a strong diplomatic protest, summoning the Chinese charge d’affaires in Delhi and demanding
In the past 72 hours, US Senators Roger Wicker, Dan Sullivan and Ruben Gallego took to social media to publicly rebuke the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) over the defense budget. I understand that Taiwan’s head is on the chopping block, and the urgency of its security situation cannot be overstated. However, the comments from Wicker, Sullivan and Gallego suggest they have fallen victim to a sophisticated disinformation campaign orchestrated by an administration in Taipei that treats national security as a partisan weapon. The narrative fed to our allies claims the opposition is slashing the defense budget to kowtow to the Chinese
In a Taipei Times editorial published almost three years ago (“Macron goes off-piste,” April 13, 2023, page 8), French President Emmanuel Macron was criticized for comments he made immediately after meeting Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing. Macron had spoken of the need for his country to find a path on Chinese foreign policy no longer aligned with that of the US, saying that continuing to follow the US agenda would sacrifice the EU’s strategic autonomy. At the time, Macron was criticized for gifting Xi a PR coup, and the editorial said that he had been “persuaded to run
The wrap-up press event on Feb. 1 for the new local period suspense film Murder of the Century (世紀血案), adapted from the true story of the Lin family murders (林家血案) in 1980, has sparked waves of condemnation in the past week, as well as a boycott. The film is based on the shocking, unsolved murders that occurred at then-imprisoned provincial councilor and democracy advocate Lin I-hsiung’s (林義雄) residence on Feb. 28, 1980, while Lin was detained for his participation in the Formosa Incident, in which police and protesters clashed during a pro-democracy rally in Kaohsiung organized by Formosa Magazine on Dec.
RSS