To further his ballot-box appeal and please Beijing, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) walks a fine line. He seems to be incapable of supporting any solid position regarding cross-strait affairs, especially in the context of Taiwan's national security.
For instance, Ma's fence-straddling habit quickly sparked a spirited argument with the host when interviewed recently on the BBC's Hardtalk program, where he stated that he was against China's "Anti-Secession" Law on the grounds that the threat of force had been there for years and it was unnecessary and unwise for Beijing to codify it.
In other words, he was acknowledging the existence of Beijing's threat but had not yet staked a position either for or against it. One comes away with the impression that he was exercising some astonishing logic: as long as the threat has been there for a while, it's immune to righteous scrutiny -- or, it's Beijing's "squatters rights".
He might also be applying this same reasoning to his handling of the KMT's ill-gotten assets. Given that they were looted from the public or coerced from private citizens decades ago, he reasons, they should all be considered "rightfully owned" by the KMT.
Ma and the KMT's difficulties with commonly accepted logic start with the fantastical interpretation of the current status of Taiwan: namely, Taiwan is part of a Republic of China that encompasses the present-day People's Republic of China and the Republic of Mongolia, reality notwithstanding.
The KMT has had 50 years of opportunity to cultivate within Taiwan that line of thinking -- including the KMT's squatters rights to Taiwan. Ma was the first KMT leader foolhardy enough to try to defend the KMT position abroad and quickly discovered that his non-stick Teflon image failed to impress.
Even within Taiwan, the KMT's brand of logic is increasingly untenable.
Recently Ma placed an ad in the Liberty Times stating that Taiwan's formal independence is an option which Taiwan's people can eventually choose. He later added that the KMT is totally against that option.
One can then surmise that Ma was merely acknowledging the existence of the formal independence option and that the KMT is going to work to prevent the Taiwanese people from ever taking that option. In other words, the ad was only meant to be informative. Perhaps even more accurately, Ma would like to make the Taiwanese people "appreciate" that he himself is finally aware of the option.
However, if Ma were sincere about the option in accordance with the principle of freedom of choice, he would be very much in favor of a referendum on sovereignty in Taiwan before any formal inter-governmental talks between Taiwan and China commence. That's because Beijing's condition for any talks is that Taiwan accede to Beijing's "one China" framework.
Ma has not yet shown any inclination for a referendum on any subject. The same whimsical approach was applied to his attempt at dealing with the subject of the 228 Incident. Ma has so far offered a verbal apology to some of the descendents of the victims and promised to do the same thing over and over again in the future. He and the KMT seem to believe that should be the extent of it.
Ma would not even acknowledge that the slaughter and imprisonment of practically all Taiwanese political leaders of the 228 era was a systematic and heinous design by an external, authoritarian, KMT regime to silence and cow a newly-looted land. Therefore, he ignored the fact that the apology and atonement should be directed at not only the descendents of the victims but also the Taiwanese public for depriving them of the benefit of decades of Taiwanese leadership.
The clearest and fullest way of achieving redemption would be to do things Ma and the KMT will not do, namely changing the party name to the Taiwanese Nationalist Party, renouncing its unification goal, relinquishing ownership of all ill-gotten party assets and releasing all items related to the 228 Incident. Unfortunately, in place of atonement, Ma is striving to bring to the Taiwanese people the possibility of a repeat -- with the magnitude multiplied untold times -- of the 228 Incident.
Ma might eventually do more than just add insult to the injury of the Taiwanese people.
Huang Jei-hsuan
California
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS