China's annual National People's Congress (NPC) inevitably brings with it an absurd escalation of cross-strait tension. The cause lies in the fact that this so-called "highest representative body," which has never been subject to popular elections, simply serves to rubber stamp the inflammatory policies of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
Lately, it has also been serving to distract as many people as possible from the escalation of rural anger at corruption and land theft by invoking that most convenient of chestnuts: Taiwanese "splittism."
It is hilarious to witness Premier Wen Jiabao (
What does Beijing mean when it talks of "the will of the people" and "international trends"? After all, it has never held national elections or referendums, so what is the basis of such statements? Its repeated and recycled condemnation of the Taiwanese government invites scorn.
Communist regimes are notorious for violating the law and fabricating public opinion. This is why such regimes have been rejected all around the world. We can see that it is the overthrow of communist regimes that tallies with the wishes of most people and international trends. Absurd statements about the will of the people by Chinese officials merely serve to underline their shortcomings.
NPC toadying also serves as a mirror for the activities of the pan-blue camp. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the People First Party have repeatedly stated that they will hold demonstrations against the abolition of the NUC, and have distorted the significance of this action, stating that it is an attempt by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government to achieve de jure independence. This statement belittles the fact that it is only Taiwanese who have the right to determine their political future. Indifferent to public sentiment, the pan-blue camp remind the skeptical of its authoritarian nature.
The NUC is indeed an absurd product of an absurd era, for it upholds the idea of "China united under the Three Principles of the People," which had currency during KMT rule. Now, with the demise of the Chiang family dictatorship, the idea of retaking China has become something of a joke, for Taiwanese are perfectly clear about the fact that unification with China implies one thing only: subjugation.
Yet the pan-blue camp continues to pursue the interests of a minority and tries to force the idea of unification with China down the throats of a majority that is clearly suspicious of it.
The only consistent position for a democratic society to hold is rejecting the sham words of a sham congress, as well as those of their local soulmates.
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS