When a society fails to live up to expectations of harmony and stability, people critical of the society usually tend to imagine even greater threats. Recent reports about people who have committed suicide amid concerns over their credit card or cash card debts are examples of such a threat. The problems associated with lax card issuance, if not resolved by both the government and banks, could generate grave social problems and a series of economic consequences such as rising bad debts, a shrinking consumer loan business and a less promising outlook for the financial sector and the economy as a whole.
To ensure the overall health of the banking industry, the Financial Supervisory Commission and banks have put in place a card-debt negotiation mechanism for debt-ridden cardholders. Banks have also started to adopt flexible pricing on debt paybacks and agreed to halt debt-collecting activities for three months for unemployed debtors and low-income borrowers.
This will give the nation a chance to review what the social and economic consequences could be, after the commission failed in its duty to first warn banks of possible risks that could follow from issuing numerous credit cards to the same customer. It also gives banks a good lesson that when they aggressively promoted credit and cash cards a few years ago, they underestimated the importance of risk management and thus created a potential for bad loans.
But is mounting consumer bad debt supremely unmanageable for banks? No, it isn't. According to a report released by Standard & Poor's last week, card loans accounted for just 4.3 percent of total outstanding credit in Taiwan at the end of last September, while domestic banks remain supported by a stable macroeconomic environment and adequate capitalization. This means the situation is manageable.
But there are other questions: Isn't card issuance solely a responsibility of banks? Aren't card loans the main factor contributing to suicides rather than other forms of consumer credit? The answer to both is still "No." In fact, when most news media and critics began to paint the heavily indebted as "card slaves" and banks as "bloodsuckers," it was simply to serve the role of attracting public attention to banks' high revolving interest rates. However, these criticisms demonstrate a lack of understanding of the debtors' portfolios or any empirical evidence.
While card loans may not be ideal, their growing popularity reflects the relative appeal of credit and cash cards. They represent a type of unsecured debt, an easily accessible line of credit and perhaps a source of credit of last resort that debtors can use to stay afloat and avoid defaulting on other bills. To low-income borrowers, these cards may serve as a substitute for other sources of funds such as pawn shops and personal finance companies.
Therefore, unless there is a clear picture of the debtors' portfolios as well as empirical studies on the correlation between card use and household indebtedness, there is no reason to claim that these cards "kill" people as some have suggested, although the high revolving interest rates certainly irritate.
The government and lawmakers have to work together to enact a bankruptcy law for individual borrowers and offer a contingency plan to address employment and loan problems facing heavily-indebted, low-income cardholders. But there should be no sympathy for borrowers who spend far beyond their means. Instead, we should start to worry about a possible "moral hazard" situation where some debtors may try to avoid paybacks through a debt negotiation mechanism or the proposed individual bankruptcy law.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
RSS