The response of Sanchong Mayor Lee Chien-lung (李乾龍) to the central government's order to fly flags at half mast in remembrance of the 228 Incident ("Remembering 228: Poor timing leads to flag-flying blunder," March 1, page 4) is sadly typical of a party that still feels it committed no error in slaughtering thousands of Taiwanese, no matter what its pop-star leader might say. It is typical of their determination to avoid looking at the past, because it is colored with the blood of the Taiwanese they had so contemptuously co-opted into their narrow political agenda for 40 years.
Should we also not remember the Holocaust because it is a "sad memory" for so many? Perhaps we should also not remember the Japanese actions in Nanjing, the Serbian actions in Kosovo, the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia, and the British in India and South Africa?
It is not surprising that many pan-blue camp members and supporters don't want the Taiwanese to remember the history of this country, since it sheds such a bad light on their capability for ruthlessness, selfishness and opportunism. Not only are we instructed not to remember "sad" memories (and thereby not learn from them either), but we are also instructed to not hope for a future in which Taiwanese determine their own affairs. According to Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma (Mao?) Ying-jeou (
So much for democracy.
But, as the 228 Incident illustrates, that was and is not something that the KMT considers important or beneficial. Reconciliation is an honest and needed process, but how can that begin when the KMT still can't face its own actions? It would rather we all developed amnesia. It also hopes we can all develop Alzheimer's as well so that we won't be able to see the utterly cowardly and shamefaced way it intends to sell out Taiwan as soon as it regains power.
Perhaps we should demand that Ma must recognize the sovereignty of Taiwan before he is even allowed to stand for the office of president. But, knowing him, he'll find a slippery way to say it without meaning it.
Well done, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), on abolishing the National Unification Council and unification guidelines. Now is the time to embed this great country's independence and sovereignty before the people are fear-mongered into a really bad decision in 2008.
Ben Goren
Taipei
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
RSS