A few days ago, Vice Premier Tsai Ing-wen (
We do not object to the idea of the government's wanting to encourage investment flows back to Taiwan as a major cog in its economic development strategy. However, we would remind them that they should not seek to gain investment flows from Taiwanese businesses already investing in China at the expense of its basic policy for the effective management of investment in China and prioritizing investments in Taiwan.
In the past, pro-unification writers and media have maintained that it is better to encourage investment flows back into Taiwan than to waste resources on management measures that run counter to the market, and they have used this as a smoke screen for their efforts to undermine the "effective management" policy. This has forced the government's hand in how it implement its policy, effectively reducing the "Taiwan first" strategy to a mere slogan and thus bringing it to an early death.
Superficially, encouraging investment flows back into Taiwan sounds tempting because it doesn't suffer from the problems that afflict effective management of Taiwanese investments in China. But this is just a way of pulling the wool over the eyes of the Taiwanese people. It is also exactly what the blue camp wants, and why all the politicians are going in this direction. The idea of Taiwan as a regional operational hub and inducing Taiwanese businesses in China to list on the Taiwan stock exchange, are all products of this way of thinking.
The biggest flaw in the investment flows idea is that it obscures the significance of effective management of Taiwanese investment in China. Logically speaking, investment flowing out is a precondition to it being able to flow back in again: If the government wishes to encourage a flow of investment in Taiwan from Taiwanese investment in China, it has to set up favorable conditions for Taiwanese businesses to invest in China in the first place. Seen in this way, the policy can be equated with encouraging investment in China.
The actual amount of money flowing out is many times the amount flowing back, but although the government's attempts to encourage companies to set up operational headquarters in Taiwan is bearing fruit, and despite the considerable tax incentives offered, more and more enterprises are investing in China.
The idea of Taiwanese businesses getting listed on the Taiwan stocks and securities market is also based on this kind of thinking, although this is an even clearer incentive to move to China. Under the current system, Taiwanese businesses can be listed in Taiwan irrespective of whether they are located at home or abroad so long as they conform to certain standards. And if a company put Taiwan first, the 40 percent ceiling on investment abroad should not be too limiting, and there would be no need for any other incentives.
Taiwan is not Hong Kong, nor is it New York: It has a hostile neighbor harboring the intention to invade. Therefore, any policy arrived at by the government should take into account considerations of national security, and this includes economic security.
Pro-unification elements may say that internationalization will keep China from making any rash moves, but it pays not to forget that we heard little more than a whimper from the international community when China passed the "Anti-Secession" Law last year, due to the political and economic power that China holds.
Unless China actually revokes its claims to Taiwan, the idea of an international bourse in Taiwan will dissipate into thin air, and Taiwan's investments in China will become a weapon through which pressure can be applied to Taiwan to accept the idea of "one China, two systems."
While there is no doubt that stimulating the stock market would make it easier for businesses to raise capital, it should be remembered that the state of the stock market is merely a window on the state of the economy itself: You can't stimulate the stock market in the absence of economic growth. The relaxation of laws and regulations following the transition of political power in 2000 have made all kinds of illicit transactions possible.
Although foreign capital finds its way into Taiwan, even more capital is leaving the country. Without economic growth, it is impossible to stimulate the stock market, and we continue to underperform against other East Asian stock markets amid never-ending complaints. This is evidence that the economy must be built from the ground up, and that there are no shortcuts. Short-term speculation is not the way to succeed in the long term, and the only way to stimulate the stock market is to revive the economy as a whole.
Not much time remains of President Chen Shui-bian's (
Translated by Paul Cooper and Perry Svensson
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Acting Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) has formally announced his intention to stand for permanent party chairman. He has decided that he is the right person to steer the fledgling third force in Taiwan’s politics through the challenges it would certainly face in the post-Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) era, rather than serve in a caretaker role while the party finds a more suitable candidate. Huang is sure to secure the position. He is almost certainly not the right man for the job. Ko not only founded the party, he forged it into a one-man political force, with himself
RSS