On Feb. 28, 1995, former president Lee Teng-hui (
It is 11 years since Lee made that speech. Has the ethnic divide resulting from historical events been mended? Have different ethnic groups reached a consensus on a common goal? No.
Last Sunday, the government-funded 228 Memorial Foundation published a report entitled The 228 Incident: A Report on Responsibility. The title alone tells us that its objective is to assign responsibility for the 1947 massacre. The report generated much public debate prior to its release, especially since it says that former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) was the prime culprit behind the 228 Incident. Many people believe that the release of the report is only going to put the cat among the pigeons instead of allaying ethnic conflict.
Is it really so easy to maintain social calm that all we have to do is ignore a debate over who was responsible for past rights or wrongs? Is it better that we all develop a case of collective amnesia so that as soon as the 228 Incident is mentioned, we say "historic tragedy" -- as if that means that there are no perpetrators, that victims only need compensation and that society at large can find solace and redemption simply in the word "tragedy."
For a society with no understanding of tragedy, that kind of redemption is far too cheap.
Following the collapse of the East German regime in 1989, the East's Ministry of State Security (Stasi) shredded all classified files. The German government then commissioned an organization to reconstruct the 16,000 sacks of shredded Stasi files through advanced computer reconstruction systems.
By 2009, more than 600 million pieces of torn-up files will have been pieced back together and normal people and politicians who worked for or had connections with the Stasi may well come to light. The German federal government is footing the whole bill -- a total of 60 million euros (US$71.3 million) -- for this mammoth jigsaw puzzle.
The Germans clearly do not fear that such a move will incite hatred. To them, the responsibility of perpetrators and the rehabilitation of victims cannot be dealt with simply by the word "tragedy."
How can a historical assessment built on legal concepts not founded in constitutionalism, and conclusions such as "cultural differences" and "differences in understanding" give our children a view of history based on democratic and juridical concepts?
According to the most basic principles of democracy and constitutionalism, a government is mandated by the people. The government maintains social order as specified in the Constitution and its subordinate legal system, and it executes its measures through judicial proceedings.
In what way did the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government's actions follow the above standards during 228?
A nation's armed forces are supposed to deal with its enemies -- did Chiang's government really see Taiwan as an enemy state and its people as enemies? How can a government turn its army on its people and then shirk responsibility in a country practicing democracy and the rule of law?
The time has come to attempt to assign responsibility. Rather than muddling and doing away with the memories of past ethnic conflict, we should face these memories based on the principles of democratic constitutionalism.
Lee Fu-chung is an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of Taiwan History at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
Although former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo — known for being the most pro-Taiwan official to hold the post — is not in the second administration of US president-elect Donald Trump, he has maintained close ties with the former president and involved himself in think tank activities, giving him firsthand knowledge of the US’ national strategy. On Monday, Pompeo visited Taiwan for the fourth time, attending a Formosa Republican Association’s forum titled “Towards Permanent World Peace: The Shared Mission of the US and Taiwan.” At the event, he reaffirmed his belief in Taiwan’s democracy, liberty, human rights and independence, highlighting a
The US Department of Defense recently released this year’s “Report on Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China.” This annual report provides a comprehensive overview of China’s military capabilities, strategic objectives and evolving global ambitions. Taiwan features prominently in this year’s report, as capturing the nation remains central to Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) vision of the “great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation,” a goal he has set for 2049. The report underscores Taiwan’s critical role in China’s long-term strategy, highlighting its significance as a geopolitical flashpoint and a key target in China’s quest to assert dominance
The Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) last week released the latest job vacancy data in Taiwan, which highlighted how many job openings firms had yet to be filled at the end of August last year. The data also revealed how the vacant positions were closely related to the business climate that industrial and services sectors faced at the time. The DGBAS collects data on job vacancies at the end of February, May, August and November every year. The number of job vacancies includes recruits for expanding operations and additional production lines as well as for openings related to
The Legislative Yuan passed legislation on Tuesday aimed at supporting the middle-aged generation — defined as people aged 55 or older willing and able to work — in a law initially proposed by Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Legislator Wu Chun-cheng (吳春城) to help the nation transition from an aged society to a super-aged society. The law’s passage was celebrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the TPP. The brief show of unity was welcome news, especially after 10 months of political fighting and unconstitutional amendments that are damaging democracy and the constitutional order, eliciting concern
RSS