Besides commemorating the 228 Incident, what other lessons can we learn from this tragedy? The atrocities committed by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) should be condemned, but the government should take more concrete actions to solve the problems left by this "systematic slaughter" and disseminate the truth more widely.
Paying compensation to the victims and their relatives, however, is not the best way to heal the wounds of this trauma. Since the recently released The 228 Incident: A Report on Responsibility confirms that Chang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and other former KMT leaders were responsible for the 228 Incident, the government should bring the party to justice as soon as possible. Only by doing so can justice be achieved.
The report, however, cannot easily influence those people brainwashed by the KMT. In order for more Taiwanese people to understand our past, the government should make an effort to promote the viewpoints of this report. One way would be to put the truth of the 228 Incident into the "Grades 1-9 Curriculum Guidelines" for students' human rights education.
The government should also let the international community know about this history. Many of my foreign friends who care about Taiwan have asked me where they can get the English translation of this report. The 228 Memorial Foundation should translate the report into English, Japanese, German and other languages. It must also update the official English Web pages relative to this event.
The 228 Incident should not be a massacre in which there were only victims but no murderers. The KMT must admit its guilt, sincerely apologize to the Taiwanese and be fairly judged.
The truth of the 228 Incident should be widely publicized so that people here and abroad will be able to understand the history of this nation based on the standpoint of Taiwanese, not that of the KMT or China.
Su Yen-pin
Yungho
In 1947, after the 228 Incident, Chiang Kai-shek sent a massive number of troops from China to Taiwan to "suppress riots"; tens of thousands of the local elite were killed. This year, after the cessation of the National Unification Council (NUC) and unification guidelines was announced, Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) described Taiwan's announcement as "gravely provocative." Is history to be repeated?
The 228 Incident and the scrapping of the NUC are part of the Taiwanese struggle for freedom and democracy against first, the KMT, and second, the Chinese Communists. What makes the Taiwanese people feel sad is that many KMT members in Taiwan are helping their former enemy try to annex Taiwan. They are like "house rats biting hemp bags" (a Taiwanese metaphor).
In the late 1940s, these people fled to Taiwan to escape communism. Today, they want to import communism to Taiwan.
KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
When Chen attended the 228 Memorial ceremony on Tuesday, he repeatedly asked "Have I done something wrong to announce the cessation of the NUC?" In unison, the audience shouted "No." The victims of the 228 Incident now in heaven seemed to echo the audience who were honoring them. They also shouted that they had done nothing wrong in 1947.
The global trend is toward freedom, democracy and self-determination. There is no way for Taiwan to go against this trend. Bad history should not be repeated.
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
On a mournful occasion where there are victims, but no culprits, the mourning is empty.
Of course the KMT, given its usual unwillingness to assume responsibility for its actions, shows the same attitude about the 228 Incident. Former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) apologized when he headed the KMT administration, but that was because he is a Taiwanese who feels compassion for the suffering of fellow Taiwanese.
Had Taiwan still been led by a KMT president of Mainlander descent, there would have been no apology. Just see how Ma Ying-jeou has tried to avoid this subject as much as possible.
How about Taiwan-born Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pin (王金平)? He doesn't have the guts to initiate social justice.
The People's Republic of China (PRC) is ruthless in its treatment of its own people -- such as Falun Gong members, Tibetans and land owners who are forced to give up their land so factories can be built.
The way the PRC sees Taiwan now is the same way the KMT viewed Taiwan some 60 years ago -- those islanders' lives mean nothing. The Taiwanese people must not have any illusions that they will be treated fairly by the PRC.
Congratulations on the publication of The 228 Incident: A Report on Responsibility.
Justina Wang
Chicago, Illinois
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS