People often argue that one should not mix politics with sports. For the longest time however, Taiwan has been victimized by China's bullying and its athletes forced to compete under the name "Chinese Taipei" at various international events thanks to the pact signed in 1981 between the then Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government and the International Olympic Committee.
While it is understandable that Taiwan needs to honor the pact and thus follow the rules set out in the agreement -- which stated that in return for being allowed to participate in international sporting events, sports teams must use the name "Chinese Taipei" and fly the "Chinese Taipei Olympic flag" -- it should be a different fight when it comes to non-Olympic events.
Taiwan, however, is still being forced to use the label "Chinese Taipei" in non-Olympic events such as the World Baseball Classic.
The upcoming Classic is neither an Olympic event nor an event held under the auspices of the UN. It is an international tournament featuring mayor league players. It will be staged for the first time next month, with the final game scheduled to be played in San Diego, California.
While the online encyclopedia Wikipedia deserves kudos for using Taiwan as the nation's title when listing the 16 participating teams, the World Baseball Classic's official Web site lists the national team under the name "Chinese Taipei," while China has listed the team under the name "China, Taipei" on its Web site.
China's vulgar act has drawn the ire of Taiwanese Web surfers. It should, however, remind all Taiwanese that they should refuse to be silent in the face of China's incessant coercion and oppression.
Since the 1981 pact condemned Taiwan to the name "Chinese Taipei," protests over the title at non-Olympic events have drawn rapid opposition from China and have led to accusations of "politicizing sports."
But who are the people of "Chinese Taipei"? This ghost does not exist on any map.
According to a survey conducted last year by the Government Information Office, a majority of people in the US, Japan and Germany view Taiwan as "Taiwan," not "Chinese Taipei," "China, Taipei," or "part of China" for that matter.
According to a recent poll conducted by the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times' sister newspaper), almost 60 percent of respondents viewed themselves as Taiwanese. Just 8.6 percent said they considered themselves to be Chinese.
Should Taiwan continue playing dumb and tolerating these indignities, it will appear increasingly natural for the international community and Taiwanese themselves to use this wretched title.
While Taiwan is bound for the moment by the 1981 pact, this does not mean that the nation should passively accept alternative titles at other international events.
All the affected government agencies -- from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to the National Council on Physical Fitness and Sports -- should fight to increase Taiwan's visibility and win it respect in domestic and international settings.
If politicizing sports is what it takes to defend this nation's dignity, then so be it. Only the terminally naive could argue that "Chinese Taipei" does not represent an ongoing political insult.
US President Donald Trump last week told reporters that he had signed about 12 letters to US trading partners, which were set to be sent out yesterday, levying unilateral tariff rates of up to 70 percent from Aug. 1. However, Trump did not say which countries the letters would be sent to, nor did he discuss the specific tariff rates, reports said. The news of the tariff letters came as Washington and Hanoi reached a trade deal earlier last week to cut tariffs on Vietnamese exports to the US to 20 percent from 46 percent, making it the first Asian country
As things heated up in the Middle East in early June, some in the Pentagon resisted American involvement in the Israel-Iran war because it would divert American attention and resources from the real challenge: China. This was exactly wrong. Rather, bombing Iran was the best thing that could have happened for America’s Asia policy. When it came to dealing with the Iranian nuclear program, “all options are on the table” had become an American mantra over the past two decades. But the more often US administration officials insisted that military force was in the cards, the less anyone believed it. After
On Monday, Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) delivered a welcome speech at the ILA-ASIL Asia-Pacific Research Forum, addressing more than 50 international law experts from more than 20 countries. With an aim to refute the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) claim to be the successor to the 1945 Chinese government and its assertion that China acquired sovereignty over Taiwan, Lin articulated three key legal positions in his speech: First, the Cairo Declaration and Potsdam Declaration were not legally binding instruments and thus had no legal effect for territorial disposition. All determinations must be based on the San Francisco Peace
During an impromptu Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) rally on Tuesday last week to protest what the party called the unfairness of the judicial system, a young TPP supporter said that if Taiwan goes to war, he would “surrender to the [Chinese] People’s Liberation Army [PLA] with unyielding determination.” The rally was held after former Taipei deputy mayor Pong Cheng-sheng’s (彭振聲) wife took her life prior to Pong’s appearance in court to testify in the Core Pacific corruption case involving former Taipei mayor and TPP chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲). The TPP supporter said President William Lai (賴清德) was leading them to die on
RSS