The most basic decision any modern political leader must make is whether to take an aggressive or conciliatory approach. Sometimes one must decide to press on with bold initiatives without consulting the opposition and appeal directly to the public. But sometimes incremental changes brought about using the subtle art of negotiation are needed to help bring a nation back onto the right track.
For the past five years, President Chen Shui-bian's (
Regretfully, what has caused most of the political strife during this period is the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government's lack of judgement as to when it has sufficient mandate to run up the flag and charge, or when they need to seek consensus and move things along in stages as a minority government.
Su Tseng-chang (
The main reason for the departure of former premier Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) was the failure of his Cabinet's moderate approach in seeking reconciliation with the pan-blue alliance -- especially after the latter continued to boycott all government policy.
Last month's local government elections were the straw that broke the camel's back after the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) -- under the leadership of new Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) -- outperformed the DPP in several important counties and cities.
It is therefore understandable that the president altered the strategy of reconciliation and dialogue used over the last year into a more pragmatic and Taiwan-centered stance before he reshuffled the Cabinet.
As the mood of the nation has become exhausted by all the partisan wrangling and the political decay of the DPP government, the public is now looking to its new leaders and officials to be more accountable and responsible.
Su's integrity and efficient management during his term as governors of both Pingtung and Taipei counties is the best weapon available to the DPP government in its fight to regain public trust.
Nevertheless, Su alone will not be enough to rejuvenate public confidence in the government. Forming a "combat team" with expertise in trade, economics, social welfare, national security and adequate policy coordination techniques constitute the basic challenges for Su's Cabinet.
Su's efficient organization of his team -- bringing in a lot of new faces to the Cabinet -- illustrates the government's strong determination to pursue balanced policy implementation and use "constructive aggressiveness" when dealing with the pan-blue dominated legislature.
Any skillful politician knows how to incorporate communication and persuasion into policy making without necessarily sacrificing his or her fundamental principles. It is therefore imperative for Su's Cabinet to generate momentum in its working relationship with the pan-blue-dominated legislature while at the same time taking note of the general call to put aside partisan disputes and uphold the public interest.
It is to be expected that the pan-blues, knowing full well that Su is likely to be one of the main contenders for the DPP's ticket in the 2008 presidential race, will not give him an easy ride. But since Su is the most popular political leader within the pan-green camp, the pan-blue camp's continued use of its legislative majority to sabotage everything the government proposes will ultimately backfire in the eyes of the public.
A leader in an era of reconciliation need not limit his goals, he must just lower his voice and be prepared to take smaller steps. A leader who indulges his own personality, whether angrily or in a conciliatory manner, at the expense of public expectation, is guilty of hubris. The more a leader bends his knee and lowers his voice, the more likely that leader will gain the trust of the people.
As long as the Su Cabinet is determined to take action, stay morally and politically clean, prove capable of improving government performance and reviving public confidence when it comes to policy implementation and continued reform, then the DPP will win back public support.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
A chip made by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) was found on a Huawei Technologies Co artificial intelligence (AI) processor, indicating a possible breach of US export restrictions that have been in place since 2019 on sensitive tech to the Chinese firm and others. The incident has triggered significant concern in the IT industry, as it appears that proxy buyers are acting on behalf of restricted Chinese companies to bypass the US rules, which are intended to protect its national security. Canada-based research firm TechInsights conducted a die analysis of the Huawei Ascend 910B AI Trainer, releasing its findings on Oct.
Pat Gelsinger took the reins as Intel CEO three years ago with hopes of reviving the US industrial icon. He soon made a big mistake. Intel had a sweet deal going with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), the giant manufacturer of semiconductors for other companies. TSMC would make chips that Intel designed, but could not produce and was offering deep discounts to Intel, four people with knowledge of the agreement said. Instead of nurturing the relationship, Gelsinger — who hoped to restore Intel’s own manufacturing prowess — offended TSMC by calling out Taiwan’s precarious relations with China. “You don’t want all of
In honor of President Jimmy Carter’s 100th birthday, my longtime friend and colleague John Tkacik wrote an excellent op-ed reassessing Carter’s derecognition of Taipei. But I would like to add my own thoughts on this often-misunderstood president. During Carter’s single term as president of the United States from 1977 to 1981, despite numerous foreign policy and domestic challenges, he is widely recognized for brokering the historic 1978 Camp David Accords that ended the state of war between Egypt and Israel after more than three decades of hostilities. It is considered one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of the 20th century.
In a recent essay in Foreign Affairs, titled “The Upside on Uncertainty in Taiwan,” Johns Hopkins University professor James B. Steinberg makes the argument that the concept of strategic ambiguity has kept a tenuous peace across the Taiwan Strait. In his piece, Steinberg is primarily countering the arguments of Tufts University professor Sulmaan Wasif Khan, who in his thought-provoking new book The Struggle for Taiwan does some excellent out-of-the-box thinking looking at US policy toward Taiwan from 1943 on, and doing some fascinating “what if?” exercises. Reading through Steinberg’s comments, and just starting to read Khan’s book, we could already sense that