Every day at 4am, 18-year-old Julienne Cunha wakes to fetch water for her family. She climbs from her bed in the poky, plywood shack she shares with six relatives and collects her bucket.
In the remote northern fishing village of Alcantara where she was born, it would be nothing out of the ordinary. But these days, Julienne lives on the 20th floor of a tower block in one of the wealthiest districts of Sao Paulo, the world's third-largest city.
A resident of Prestes Maia, a colossal abandoned clothes factory that towers over central Sao Paulo, Julienne is one of the youngest members of Brazil's sem-teto or "roofless" movement -- an urban coalition growing in cities across the country. Water doesn't reach Cunha's part of Prestes Maia, so every day she treks down its spiralling staircase to collect it for relatives including her brother, sister and two son.
The roofless movement is the urban equivalent to Brazil's Movimento dos Sem Terra (MST) or Landless Movement, which has spearheaded the campaign for land reform since the 1980s. The MST defends Brazil's impoverished rural workers and reclaims unproductive land for the dispossessed. The Movimento de Sem-Teto do Centro (MSTC) on the other hand, reclaims buildings for the urban homeless and for low-income workers, many of whom work in the informal economy.
Eight years after its foundation, the MSTC is part of an ever growing coalition fighting for the rights of Brazil's urban poor, under the umbrella of the Frente de Luta por Moradia or Pro-housing Front.
Improvised shacks
Prestes Maia, Sao Paulo's biggest occupation with 22 stores in total, is home to 468 families; around 3,000 people from all over South America cram into improvised shacks constructed in what was once office space.
Walking through Prestes Maia is like taking a road trip through Brazil. On every floor a different accent hangs in the air; the exaggerated vowels of the baianos, who swapped Salvador's favelas for the bustle of Sao Paulo; the staccato consonants of the pernambucanos who fled the arid backlands of Brazil's northeast in search of work; and, on the sixth floor the portunhol of Bolivian immigrants who flick between Spanish and Portuguese as they describe their fight for survival in the occupation.
"There are lots of people here with different cultures, different ways of life," explains 49-year-old Jomarina Abreu Pires da Fonseca, an MSTC coordinator, at her home on the 11th floor of Prestes Maia.
"Someone has to try to keep order," she adds, grinning.
At first glance Prestes Maia, which sem-teto members occupied in 2002, resembles a chaotic, multi-storey shantytown; cardboard spews out of its cracked windows, graffiti litter its walls and children rattle through its wide corridors on bicycles. But the community is meticulously organised. Residents contribute 20 real (US$8.87) a month to the upkeep of the building, and a rota system exists for cleaning each floor's communal bathroom.
Fonseca holds weekly meetings at which representatives from each floor discuss house rules, new arrivals and future occupations.
Sao Paulo, like many of Brazil's large urban centers, is a city crying out for housing reform. According to the UN it has 39,289 abandoned buildings. At the same time, says the Sao Paulo-based Social Network of Justice and Human Rights, there are an estimated 15,000 homeless people here with many thousands more unable to afford decent housing outside the city's favelas, where around 2 million are thought to live.
Before becoming president, Luiz Inacio da Silva of the Workers party promised this would all change. Now, three years on and mired in an ongoing corruption scandal, da Silva is coming under fire for backtracking on his promises to Brazil's social movements.
Although Workers party propaganda still adorns many of Prestes Maia's plaster walls, anger is growing that the "shoeshine president" has not done more to help the country's poor.
Social movements
"We are petistas [supporters of the Workers party], but we have to say that he has done nothing for the social movements. We've tried to put pressure on him but what we hoped for hasn't happened," Fonseca says, as two delivery men haul the occupation's latest acquisition -- a new washing machine -- up the last of 10 flights of crumbling stairs.
Another critic is Ivone Maria Santana de Souza, a 45-year-old immigrant from a shantytown in the northeastern city of Olinda, who lives on the squat's 19th floor.
Along with her daughter and four grandchildren, de Souza spends her days separating tiny plastic hangers for a sock company. She receives 80 centavos for every kilo of hangers and the family survive off the monthly income of about 500 real.
"If we could find work [in the northeast] we'd never have come here in the first place," she says, dressed in a white nightdress bearing the words "life is good" in English.
"The money situation is horrible. If you work in the centre where do they expect you to live?" she asks. "What do they expect you to do?"
The area's housing secretary, Orlando Almeida, told a magazine recently that the centre's poor should be relocated from inner-city tenements to the city's outskirts. A new project to revitalize parts of central Sao Paulo, including one neighborhood known as Cracolandia (Crackland), aims to redevelop the area almost exclusively for the middle and upper class.
Human-rights groups say the plans will further marginalize Sao Paulo's ever-growing underclass.
Looking out from her 11th floor window at the skyscrapers across the horizon Fonseca talks of the sem-teto's plans to carry out a wave of occupations across Sao Paulo in the coming months.
"But our fight isn't just for housing," she says. "It's for healthcare, old people's rights, employment, leisure and schooling. People don't know their rights. And our fight is to make sure they do."
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS