President Chen Shui-bian (
Two factors, one long-term and one short-term, have led to the DPP's decline and its losses in last month's local government elections.
The long-term factor is Chen's intervention in the premier's moves to implement policy, which brought the administrative machinery to a standstill. The short-term factor was the blow to Hsieh's image resulting from the scandal surrounding the Kaohsiung Rapid Transit Corp. These two knotty problems placed the DPP in a difficult position.
However, these issues may very well improve once Su Tseng-chang (
First of all, in the DPP's political culture, defeat is often an asset rather than a liability. When Su resigned from his post as DPP chairman after the election defeat, his popularity rose to unprecedented heights. The reason for this was that he was willing to take responsibility for the loss, although most believed he was not the one responsible. Placed in stark contrast to Hsieh's unwillingness to resign, Su's exceptional resolve was highlighted.
Second, the long-term factor of Chen's intervention diminishing. Just like Hsieh, Su has sufficient political support within the party to counter Chen. Had Hsieh not been plagued by the KRTC scandal, it would have been difficult for Chen to replace him.
Likewise, it will be easier for Chen to bring in Su than to replace him, and we can also expect Su to use his strength to form his own policies.
Third, the KMT's victory in last month's elections was the result of KMT Chairman Ma Ying-jeou's (
In view of these points, an era of negative political competition is coming to an end, and the DPP after this realignment will be a force to reckon with.
The KMT also has to try to improve itself instead of relying on Ma's popularity alone. The KMT also has to win public support based on positive competition. If the KMT and the DPP can engage in positive and fair political competition, it will be to the benefit of all Taiwanese.
Apollo Chen is a former KMT legislator.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of