From the tsunami to hurricane Katrina, 2005 will be remembered as the year of humanitarian disasters. But will the media response to these events also go down in history as a disaster?
You wouldn't think so given the extensive press coverage of the Indian Ocean tsunami, which helped the UN raise 80 percent of its emergency appeal in 10 days.
But the Kashmir earthquake in October, in which more people were left homeless than in the tsunami, did not attract sustained press coverage. The quake has almost fallen off the news agenda -- and the UN reported a poor response to its emergency appeal. Press coverage of conflict in northern Uganda, and famine in Africa, was even briefer.
So could news editors be suffering from "compassion fatigue"? Was the press coverage and charitable donation after the tsunami a one-off? These are the concerns of aid agencies anxious that media, public and government react disproportionally to certain disasters.
"Media coverage is one of the key things that leads to the imbalance of aid. The public are generous once they're made aware of a disaster. But they only have partial exposure to events," said Brendan Cox, emergency specialist at Oxfam.
"News editors have quite a crude idea that the public is not interested in black people dying [in a country] far away. So it's hard for us to get past these gatekeepers. The media shouldn't be the arbiter of humanitarian intervention," he said.
Though Cox would not describe the media coverage of the humanitarian disasters in 2005 as a failure, he says that Oxfam commits the vast majority of its media resources to pushing interest in "forgotten emergencies."
The conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo is one example. Reports show that one month's death toll exceeded 31,000, and that 2.8 million are displaced. Yet in the UK for instance, there have been just 53 national newspaper stories on the conflict, compared with 4,543 on the tsunami.
Possible reasons for this are the difficulty of access and the dangers of reporting.
Other emergencies may go under-reported when stories are deemed too complex or when there's difficulty getting a human angle. Disasters in places with a "home connection" may get more attention.
So could next year see a change of approach? Mark Jones, editor of Reuters AlertNet (www.AlertNet.org), reckons it could. AlertNet, a news network geared primarily toward NGOs and humanitarian specialists, has just won nearly ?500,000 (US$867,000) in financial backing from the UK government to finance the first two years of a project called MediaBridge. This will be an online community for journalists reporting on humanitarian crises, providing tools and contextual content, as well as monitoring press coverage of such events.
"The media tend to go for `acts of God'", says Jones. "But if I tried to sell you the story of Congo, you might say it could wait until tomorrow, or the next day, or the next decade."
"I'd like to challenge journalists to think again about other ways to report humanitarian crises."
The project, which Jones insists will be completely independent, is the result of a study conducted by the Columbia School of Journalism which found that journalists reporting on crises need more background facts, tips on breaking stories, and information on relief agencies. MediaBridge plans to provide such information.
Another key function will be to help journalists find a new angle to a story. "You can't report that another 4,000 died in northern Uganda last month -- that's not news. What we're looking for is not a news scoop, but a contextual scoop," Jones says.
The parent website, AlertNet, receives 60,000 visitors a day. It was founded in 1997 as a response to poor reporting on the Rwandan genocide of 1994. "There was a delay in reporting this -- partly due to a lack of interest," Jones says.
Given the demise in overseas correspondents, a resource that encourages fairer reporting and the sharing of information could be an increasingly useful tool.
I came to Taiwan to pursue my degree thinking that Taiwanese are “friendly,” but I was welcomed by Taiwanese classmates laughing at my friend’s name, Maria (瑪莉亞). At the time, I could not understand why they were mocking the name of Jesus’ mother. Later, I learned that “Maria” had become a stereotype — a shorthand for Filipino migrant workers. That was because many Filipino women in Taiwan, especially those who became house helpers, happen to have that name. With the rapidly increasing number of foreigners coming to Taiwan to work or study, more Taiwanese are interacting, socializing and forming relationships with
Earlier signs suggest that US President Donald Trump’s policy on Taiwan is set to move in a more resolute direction, as his administration begins to take a tougher approach toward America’s main challenger at the global level, China. Despite its deepening economic woes, China continues to flex its muscles, including conducting provocative military drills off Taiwan, Australia and Vietnam recently. A recent Trump-signed memorandum on America’s investment policy was more about the China threat than about anything else. Singling out the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as a foreign adversary directing investments in American companies to obtain cutting-edge technologies, it said
The recent termination of Tibetan-language broadcasts by Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) is a significant setback for Tibetans both in Tibet and across the global diaspora. The broadcasts have long served as a vital lifeline, providing uncensored news, cultural preservation and a sense of connection for a community often isolated by geopolitical realities. For Tibetans living under Chinese rule, access to independent information is severely restricted. The Chinese government tightly controls media and censors content that challenges its narrative. VOA and RFA broadcasts have been among the few sources of uncensored news available to Tibetans, offering insights
Two weeks ago, Malaysian actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) raised hackles in Taiwan by posting to her 2.6 million Instagram followers that she was visiting “Taipei, China.” Yeoh’s post continues a long-standing trend of Chinese propaganda that spreads disinformation about Taiwan’s political status and geography, aimed at deceiving the world into supporting its illegitimate claims to Taiwan, which is not and has never been part of China. Taiwan must respond to this blatant act of cognitive warfare. Failure to respond merely cedes ground to China to continue its efforts to conquer Taiwan in the global consciousness to justify an invasion. Taiwan’s government
RSS