The popular party drug ketamine (also known as K or Special K) is a dissociative drug, a drug that blocks signals to the conscious mind from other parts of the brain, most often the physical senses. Is this drug the reason that voters in Taitung County elected a commissioner whose corruption conviction is under appeal and who is an alleged vote-buyer on bail, or are criminal politicians acceptable?
If one presumes that voters do not approve of corruption, then K might be the answer. In the lead-up to the election, perhaps in order to find some relief from the mud-slinging, cacophony of improbable promises and low-rent slapstick that passes for a campaign, 62,189 people, or 59.18 percent of Taitung's voting population, may have been under the influence of ketamine.
Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia, says that at a medium to high dosage level users may experience difficulty in perceiving distance and duration as well as suffering from visual update lag. There have been reports of users seeing surroundings in two distinct images, as if the brain was unable to merge what each eye sees. There were, after all, three candidates in the County commissioner election. Seeing three of them twice would make six heads in total, and that could have been the reason behind the focal folly when it came to placing the chop on the voting slip.
Even at a low dosage, K users may experience hallucinations, especially in dark rooms, or in this case, curtained polling booths. Deprived of the blue, orange and green representing the parties on ballots, voters may have overcompensated for the dearth of color heralding the three independent candidates and been victim to the darker shades of illegality when voting.
In the event of an excessive dose, users may go into a `K-hole,' a state of deep dissociation wherein other worlds or dimensions are perceived without any recognition of personal identity. Kindhearted voters may have succumbed to utopian fantasies in which convicted criminals appeared as avuncular avatars of the common good, son of Sam becomes Santa Claus and so on.
And yet, if Special K is simply a breakfast cereal and the good folk of Taitung County are not the hipster K crowd imagined here, there is real cause for concern that both the rule of law and democracy are both so cynically mocked. The authorities need to move swiftly to show that criminals in public office are not OK and that politics in Taiwan is not the K-hole that it so frequently appears to be.
William Meldrum
Taipei
I came to Taiwan to pursue my degree thinking that Taiwanese are “friendly,” but I was welcomed by Taiwanese classmates laughing at my friend’s name, Maria (瑪莉亞). At the time, I could not understand why they were mocking the name of Jesus’ mother. Later, I learned that “Maria” had become a stereotype — a shorthand for Filipino migrant workers. That was because many Filipino women in Taiwan, especially those who became house helpers, happen to have that name. With the rapidly increasing number of foreigners coming to Taiwan to work or study, more Taiwanese are interacting, socializing and forming relationships with
Whether in terms of market commonality or resource similarity, South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co is the biggest competitor of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). The two companies have agreed to set up factories in the US and are also recipients of subsidies from the US CHIPS and Science Act, which was signed into law by former US president Joe Biden. However, changes in the market competitiveness of the two companies clearly reveal the context behind TSMC’s investments in the US. As US semiconductor giant Intel Corp has faced continuous delays developing its advanced processes, the world’s two major wafer foundries, TSMC and
We are witnessing a sea change in the government’s approach to China, from one of reasonable, low-key reluctance at rocking the boat to a collapse of pretense over and patience in Beijing’s willful intransigence. Finally, we are seeing a more common sense approach in the face of active shows of hostility from a foreign power. According to Article 2 of the 2020 Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法), a “foreign hostile force” is defined as “countries, political entities or groups that are at war with or are engaged in a military standoff with the Republic of China [ROC]. The same stipulation applies to
The following case, which I experienced as an interpreter, illustrates that many issues in Taiwan’s legal system originate from law enforcement personnel. The problem stems not so much from their education and training, but their personal attitude — characterized by excessive self-confidence paired with a lack of accountability. One day at 10:30am, I was called to a police station in New Taipei City for an emergency. I arrived an hour later. A man was tied to a chair, having been arrested at the airport due to an outstanding arrest warrant. It quickly became apparent that the case was related to
RSS