Recently, both the domestic and foreign media reported how Chinese paramilitary police shot dead a number of villagers during protests over the government's compulsory confiscation of land in Dongzhou, Guangdong Province.
Because of different opinions over the death toll, the riot grabbed the attention of the international community. The shootings show the vicious nature of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), that party that claims China is "peacefully rising" on one hand, but in order to maintain its rule, resorts to armed force when suppressing its own people on the other.
Before the Dongzhou incident, some people still fostered the illusion that China would change as its economy booms. As recently as last month, US President George W. Bush prodded Beijing to emulate Taiwan and create a free Chinese society.
On Oct. 19, China's State Council issued a white paper entitled Building Political Democracy in China, which put special emphasis on its "present political and democratic achievements." The real purpose, however, was to cover up any domestic controversy by, as the report put it, "establishing a harmonious society."
However, according to recent statistics from Taiwan's Mainland Affairs Council, there were more than 74,000 protests in China last year. These figures reveal that democratic consciousness is rooted in the minds of Chinese people and is on the rise. Nevertheless, the white paper has only one aim: promoting the interests of the CCP above everything else. Their "social democracy with Chinese characteristics" is, in fact, nothing but an excuse for a one-party autocracy. This violates modern democratic values.
Therefore, everyone should be wary of the current situation in China, as violent clashes may eventually lead to unrest on a nationwide scale and greatly weaken the government's legitimacy. To reduce domestic pressure, China then might manufacture an "external crisis" such as a conflict or a war.
Also, the people of Taiwan should be aware of the heinous crime committed by Chinese officials in slaughtering their own people and expose all the abuses of the CCP. From what we have seen of the killing of protesters, we can only hope that the Chinese government eventually reforms its political system. Or maybe one day the Chinese people will demonstrate their united power and topple their tyrannical government.
Dai Kai Feng
Taichung
The first Donald Trump term was a boon for Taiwan. The administration regularized the arms sales process and enhanced bilateral ties. Taipei will not be so fortunate the second time around. Given recent events, Taiwan must proceed with the assumption that it cannot count on the United States to defend it — diplomatically or militarily — during the next four years. Early indications suggested otherwise. The nomination of Marco Rubio as US Secretary of State and the appointment of Mike Waltz as the national security advisor, both of whom have expressed full-throated support for Taiwan in the past, raised hopes that
Whether in terms of market commonality or resource similarity, South Korea’s Samsung Electronics Co is the biggest competitor of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC). The two companies have agreed to set up factories in the US and are also recipients of subsidies from the US CHIPS and Science Act, which was signed into law by former US president Joe Biden. However, changes in the market competitiveness of the two companies clearly reveal the context behind TSMC’s investments in the US. As US semiconductor giant Intel Corp has faced continuous delays developing its advanced processes, the world’s two major wafer foundries, TSMC and
Authorities last week revoked the residency permit of a Chinese social media influencer surnamed Liu (劉), better known by her online channel name Yaya in Taiwan (亞亞在台灣), who has more than 440,000 followers online and is living in Taiwan with a marriage-based residency permit, for her “reunification by force” comments. She was asked to leave the country in 10 days. The National Immigration Agency (NIA) on Tuesday last week announced the decision, citing the influencer’s several controversial public comments, including saying that “China does not need any other reason to reunify Taiwan with force” and “why is it [China] hesitant
We are witnessing a sea change in the government’s approach to China, from one of reasonable, low-key reluctance at rocking the boat to a collapse of pretense over and patience in Beijing’s willful intransigence. Finally, we are seeing a more common sense approach in the face of active shows of hostility from a foreign power. According to Article 2 of the 2020 Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法), a “foreign hostile force” is defined as “countries, political entities or groups that are at war with or are engaged in a military standoff with the Republic of China [ROC]. The same stipulation applies to
RSS