In the US-Taiwan relationship, there are some similarities in the style, and the state, of presidential leadership. In the continuous watch of what China is doing and in the amount of time the respective administrations have to prepare for the next presidential election. In this process, the US ought to be watching the contest between the two major political parties in Taiwan, just as it is without doubt watching events in China.
If it is watching, it will see the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) in turmoil, as one would expect after being badly beaten by the opposition in local elections. It was not a surprising defeat, but an unexpectedly large one that many within the party ranks believe could have been avoided.
An attempt during the first DPP administration to change the agriculture and fishery credit unions -- which for decades had been used by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) to maintain their hold on local elections -- was proposed, but the proposal was never acted upon. Many believe it could have reduced if not completely changed the results of the recent elections.
During the last campaign, changes to the preferential 18 percent interest rates that are given to some retired government bureaucrats and military personnel (a holdover from the pre-democratic system) were proposed. However, some are already suggesting this ought to be reviewed. There was also an apparent effort to prosecute candidates who participated in vote-buying (of which it is believed a very large number had been caught during the campaign), but the "black gold" problem still may not be properly addressed.
Another element that many believe is the main reason for the defeat is the revelation of corruption within the government -- a subject that the DPP had previously tried hard to associate with the opposition party. Indeed, the polls seem to indicate that the KMT gained its usual number of votes in these elections, but the DPP's number of votes dropped significantly.
On the KMT side, observers see the results greatly strengthening the standing of the new party chairman. He was already in a strong position given his experience in Taiwanese politics and his name recognition. More importantly, his English-language capability and his understanding of "Western" thinking gives him a perceived advantage over most potential DPP candidates. Following the elections, his statements have been well received both in Taiwan and the US.
Though the KMT's recent victory clearly helped him gain the support of more members within the party, there are still important difficulties to overcome. There are at least three internal matters that need addressing. The old party elite, mainly but not entirely "mainlanders," who disagree with some of the Chairman's stated objectives. Party membership is 70 percent "localized" (ie, Taiwanese,) and there are two individuals who are at least his match in politics -- Wang Jin-pyng (
The two major political parties in Taiwan will struggle with each other one way or the other for the next two-and-a-half years. China has already shown that it can interfere, indirectly through the international community and more directly in Taiwan's domestic affairs. The US on the other hand can obviously make its concerns known to Taiwan, but there is now a potential difference in Taiwan's relationship with China that could alter the US' interests there.
This could, under some circumstances, influence the US' still evolving relationship with a much different China. The US-China relationship will not just be different from the past when the US' present relationship with Taiwan was formed, but different even from its present common democratic system.
To be sure, US President George W. Bush, more than past presidents, presses the need for democratic values with China. But for practical reasons he also works to improve the US-China relationship. The biannual meeting headed by Deputy Secretary of State Robert Zoellick is an experiment in finding ways to strengthen common interests while developing means of managing issues that are problematic. It invites China "to work with us to shape the future international systems." It is intent on avoiding Cold-War tensions and the old balance of power systems.
Where will Taiwan stand in this potential new international system?
In Washington, all the issues that encompass both Taiwan and China seem to have drawn potential policies in different directions. It may be strengthening those that see the relationship with China as far more important, Taiwan democracy notwithstanding; it may influence those that see a different kind of Taiwan possibly moving to a closer relationship with China; or it may concern those that see either one as threatening. The political squabbles taking place in Taiwan are important and part of a free democratic system. Will the people be influenced to accept a different future for Taiwan?
Nat Bellocchi is a former chairman of the American Institute in Taiwan and is now a special adviser to the Liberty Times Group. The views expressed in this article are his own.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) has caused havoc with his attempts to overturn the democratic and constitutional order in the legislature. If we look at this devolution from the context of a transition to democracy from authoritarianism in a culturally Chinese sense — that of zhonghua (中華) — then we are playing witness to a servile spirit from a millennia-old form of totalitarianism that is intent on damaging the nation’s hard-won democracy. This servile spirit is ingrained in Chinese culture. About a century ago, Chinese satirist and author Lu Xun (魯迅) saw through the servile nature of
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
Monday was the 37th anniversary of former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) death. Chiang — a son of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who had implemented party-state rule and martial law in Taiwan — has a complicated legacy. Whether one looks at his time in power in a positive or negative light depends very much on who they are, and what their relationship with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is. Although toward the end of his life Chiang Ching-kuo lifted martial law and steered Taiwan onto the path of democratization, these changes were forced upon him by internal and external pressures,
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
RSS