When Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (
Ma used the traditional ploy of saying that the arms procurement budget was a mug's game. After former KMT chairman Lien Chan (
If arms procurement is a mug's game, then clearly there must be a hustler who hopes to cheat the mug out of his hard-earned dollars. Who, in Ma's estimation, is the hustler? As the arms are being bought from the US, perhaps Ma will say that Taiwan is being hustled by US arms dealers. But an arms deal at such a high level and on such a vast scale must clearly involve the US government, so is Ma also pointing his finger at the US government? But if the US government is no more than a hustler, then how has Taiwan survived this long? Where would the glow on Ma's own Harvard halo be? Surely Ma cannot forget his bonds of loyalty in order to toady up to China?
Looking at Ma's attitude to the communists in China, we see that he is mild in his criticisms, calling them "undemocratic" rather than a "one-party state." On the recent massacre in Shanwei, Ma has avoided making any comment, so as not to offend China. Moreover, in recent interviews with the press, he has even suggested that "Beijing is in no hurry to achieve reunification" as a way of undermining Taiwan's psychological defenses, and as another means of obstructing the arms procurement bill.
If Beijing is in no hurry, then what is the purpose of its various ploys that are part of its "united front" strategy, including having the KMT propose inviting the chief of China's Taiwan Affairs Office Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) and other "united front" officials to Taiwan? In obstructing the arms procurement act, Ma is falling in line with Beijing's plans to "liberate" Taiwan and create the conditions for yet another 228 Incident. That's why his actions in relation to the 228 Incident are so clearly hypocritical.
Can arms procurement be a mug's game? Certainly it can. The Lafayette case is a perfect example. Not only did KMT officials cooperating with China obtain vast kickbacks that drove the price of the weapons up to astronomical levels, but France also passed on all the secret blueprints to China. Why did the prospect that the information would be declassified and sent to Taiwan make Ma so nervous?
Let us hope that Ma and Wang can compromise for the sake of the country and allow the arms procurement budget to pass. The government and the military have already made numerous concessions to this end. Surely Ma does not want to risk creating an irreparable rift with the US merely in order to continue the cooperation between the KMT and China.
Paul Lin is a commentator based in New York.
Translated by Ian Bartholomew
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS