Ben Bernanke, nominated on Monday to chair the US Federal Reserve, is seen in financial markets as a steady hand likely to continue most policies of chairman Alan Greenspan, although some question his credentials on fighting inflation.
Bernanke, who spent three years as a member of the Fed before becoming head of US President George W. Bush's council of economic advisers, was nominated by Bush on Monday to replace Greenspan, who is retiring, as head of the powerful central bank.
The 51-year-old Bernanke earned a reputation at the central bank for being the chief "hawk" on deflation at a time when the US economy was recovering from recession and the Sept. 11 terror attacks.
But analysts point out that he has solid economic credentials from a career spanning two decades.
Drew Matus, economist at Lehman Brothers, said the markets' reaction was favorable "largely because it's someone we know and, we were concerned it might be something like [Bush's controversial nomination of Harriet Miers at] the Supreme Court."
Matus said he sees Bernanke as "someone who is a very steady hand, someone who the market knows and is not likely to change policy much."
Matus added that Bernanke's comments at the White House helped reassure those who might have felt he was soft on inflation.
Bernanke said he would maintain continuity with the policies and strategies of the long Greenspan era.
"He was the chief deflation hawk but people have misinterpreted that to think he would be soft on inflation," Matus said.
"He is an inflation targeter. So if we're at the high end of the range he will be an inflation hawk," he said.
Still, some analysts are concerned Bernanke might not be as tough on inflation as Greenspan.
"Today's nomination of Bernanke as Fed chairman is certainly positive for the equity markets and probably negative for the bond markets," said Tim Ghriskey, chief investment officer at New York-based hedge fund firm Solaris Asset Management.
"His reputation in the investment community is that he's less hawkish than Greenspan on inflation and therefore less likely to raise rates aggressively in the face of inflation. That type of more liberal stance on interest rates scares the bond market, which fears inflation above everything else but cheers the stock market because it means more growth," Ghriskey said.
"I don't think he's a loose-money dove," said Jeff Knight, chief investment officer of global asset allocation at Putnam Investments. "I view him has being process-oriented and adapting policies to maintain stability, rather then being so focused on deflation. Instead, today the threat is inflationary pressures."
Others note Bernanke will have to prove his mettle to Wall Street.
"Bernanke is not a strong markets person. Neither was Greenspan when he took over at the Fed," said Robert Brusca at FAO Economics.
"So, on this score he will have to earn his respect. Bernanke is smart and one of the best-trained and most able economists to hold the top spot at the Fed. But he is replacing Greenspan, who may be the smoothest Fed operator ever," he said.
Bernanke has previously spoken in favor of setting inflation targets, in the manner of central banks in Europe and Canada.
David Watt at BMO Nesbitt Burns said the central bank "has been running a de facto inflation target anyway," so any move by Bernanke to formalize this "would not be a huge step."
But Matus at Lehman Brothers said he does not expect a formal target from the Fed.
"Bernanke is in favor of inflation targeting, but it's one thing to say that when you're an academic, and another thing when you're in charge of monetary policy," he said
"Do you turn the power over to an economic model? Most people would probably rely on their gut instinct, which is what Greenspan has been known for," Matus said.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
On Wednesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) drew parallels between the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) under President William Lai (賴清德) now and the fascism of Germany under Adolf Hitler. The German Institute Taipei, Berlin’s de facto embassy in Taiwan, expressed on social media its “deep disappointment and concern” over the comments. “We must state unequivocally: Taiwan today is in no way comparable to the tyranny of National Socialism,” it said, referring to the Nazi Party. “We are disappointed and concerned to learn about the inappropriate comparison between the atrocities of the Nazi regime and the current political context