As Retrocession Day approaches, it will no doubt warm the cockles of many a pan-blue supporter to recall the old days when China was expanding.
For left-leaning pan-greens, there will be denial that the surrender of Japanese troops to ROC General Chen Yi (
As a Canadian, I think of Retrocession Day as the Taiwanese equivalent of Remembrance Day. Therefore I normally avoid thinking of contentious issues. Instead I think of the plight of ordinary soldiers.
However, the recent visit by Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi to the Yasukuni Shrine introduces a grain of controversy. Much is made of the fact that war criminals are buried at the Yasukuni Shrine, but many fail to appreciate that more than 30,000 Taiwanese soldiers who fought for the Japanese -- the vast majority under compulsion -- are also honored there.
These soldiers should be honored, and it is long overdue for Taiwan to establish its own shrine that will provide a home to the spirits of these weary and listless soldiers. Therefore I propose a constructive solution that could help relieve some of the anguish associated with Koizumi's annual treks to the Yasukuni Shrine: Let the Japanese and Taiwanese governments coordinate on the establishment of a shrine in Taiwan to honor Taiwanese soldiers that died while serving their Japanese colonial masters.
The next time Japan's prime minister visits the Yasukuni Shrine (as he surely will), let him symbolically lead the Taiwanese spirits from the shrine to a waiting jet, where they can join the prime minister on a voyage that will take them to Taiwan's newly constructed shrine.
While this gesture would not erase the memory of atrocities committed by the Japanese against countless Chinese during WWII, it will certainly be a comfort to the families of the fallen Taiwanese colonial soldiers, who will no longer have to visit a shrine that also honors war criminals when they want to honor their ancestors.
I realize the probability of this happening is low. But as long as I am dreaming, let me also suggest the while the Japanese prime minister helps consecrate the Taiwan shrine, he also apologize for the treatment of Taiwanese comfort women during WWII.
Thor McGillacuddy
Taipei
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
RSS