The long-delayed approval of the Control Yuan nominees finally appears to have renewed hope, as the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has recently expressed some goodwill. However, this goodwill is contingent on raising the nominee approval threshold from a simple majority vote to a two-thirds majority vote. Otherwise, even the nominee review process will be grounded, not to mention the actual confirmations.
It is said that this idea was inspired by the "German spirit."
The Taiwanese are always appropriating ideas from foreign constitutional systems, so this is nothing new. Nevertheless, it is also common for people to take things out of context. This interpretation of the German spirit serves as an example.
Moreover, a lawyer friend of mine "poured oil on the fire," as the Chinese saying goes, holding that the Legislative Yuan's "silence" tallies perfectly with "American spirit." That is, freedom of speech actually allows an individual both the right to speak and the right to silence.
So why shouldn't the legislature exercise its right and maintain its silence? The US president also enjoys the power of a "pocket veto," a maneuver that allows him to ignore legislation under certain circumstances. Therefore, the legislature's move of doing nothing about the approval is not unprecedented in light of this example. However, my friend's comments are misguided, whether looking at the matter from either the German or US perspective.
The legislature's right of approval is in fact a public right, which should not be compared to that of freedom of speech. The rights of our legislators should certainly be protected. In addition to their freedom of speech, the Constitution also gives them immunity, they cannot be prosecuted for the opinions they express on the legislative floor. They are nevertheless also under obligation to exercise the powers invested in them. Theoretically, no one can decide how Constitutional judges should interpret the Constitution, but it is difficult to imagine the Judicial Yuan President Weng Yueh-sheng (
It is also quite bizarre to compare this silence with the US president's pocket veto.
The US Constitution requires a president to sign or veto any legislation within 10 days. The only exception is that if Congress adjourns before the 10 days are up, then he can effectively veto the bill by putting it in his pocket -- because there is nowhere to return it to. On the contrary, Taiwan's legislature is able but unwilling to approve the nominees. How can these two examples be mentioned together?
The lawmakers' refusal to exercise their right of approval is even farther from the German spirit. In the German Constitutional Court's own interpretation, constitutional agencies are obligated to the Constitution and other government agencies. Apart from maintaining the separation of powers, the legislature should maintain Taiwan's constitutional system, and cooperate with other agencies to keep the government operating normally. Raising the threshold is merely doing things for appearances' sake, and ignoring the real crux of the matter.
Confrontation between governmental branches is nothing new. If lawmakers are dissatisfied with President Chen Shui-bian's (
Thomas Huang is a visiting professor in the School of Law at Shih Hsin University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Victory in conflict requires mastery of two “balances”: First, the balance of power, and second, the balance of error, or making sure that you do not make the most mistakes, thus helping your enemy’s victory. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has made a decisive and potentially fatal error by making an enemy of the Jewish Nation, centered today in the State of Israel but historically one of the great civilizations extending back at least 3,000 years. Mind you, no Israeli leader has ever publicly declared that “China is our enemy,” but on October 28, 2025, self-described Chinese People’s Armed Police (PAP) propaganda
Chinese Consul General in Osaka Xue Jian (薛劍) on Saturday last week shared a news article on social media about Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s remarks on Taiwan, adding that “the dirty neck that sticks itself in must be cut off.” The previous day in the Japanese House of Representatives, Takaichi said that a Chinese attack on Taiwan could constitute “a situation threatening Japan’s survival,” a reference to a legal legal term introduced in 2015 that allows the prime minister to deploy the Japan Self-Defense Forces. The violent nature of Xue’s comments is notable in that it came from a diplomat,
China’s third aircraft carrier, the Fujian, entered service this week after a commissioning ceremony in China’s Hainan Province on Wednesday last week. Chinese state media reported that the Fujian would be deployed to the Taiwan Strait, the South China Sea and the western Pacific. It seemed that the Taiwan Strait being one of its priorities meant greater military pressure on Taiwan, but it would actually put the Fujian at greater risk of being compromised. If the carrier were to leave its home port of Sanya and sail to the East China Sea or the Yellow Sea, it would have to transit the
The artificial intelligence (AI) boom, sparked by the arrival of OpenAI’s ChatGPT, took the world by storm. Within weeks, everyone was talking about it, trying it and had an opinion. It has transformed the way people live, work and think. The trend has only accelerated. The AI snowball continues to roll, growing larger and more influential across nearly every sector. Higher education has not been spared. Universities rushed to embrace this technological wave, eager to demonstrate that they are keeping up with the times. AI literacy is now presented as an essential skill, a key selling point to attract prospective students.
RSS