In the recent article on the Kuro P2P criminal court decision ("Kuro bosses guilty of IPR violations," Sept. 10, page 1), I was incorrectly quoted as saying that the ruling may help Taiwan get off the US Trade Representative's Watch List next year.
Many industries have recently observed serious problems with Taiwan's inaction on IP cases.
Against this backdrop of apparent backsliding on IP protection promises and the bizarre Ezpeer P2P case decision, I said that this Kuro decision was a positive step that might help keep Taiwan from being downgraded right back to the "Priority Watch" list.
Taiwan had made great progress with intellectual-property protections after its WTO accession, and it's fair to say that all of us who care about these issues were happy to see Taiwan's efforts recognized when it was upgraded from "Priority Watch" to "Watch List" last year.
However, in a very disturbing trend in the months since Taiwan's upgrade, we are getting regular reports of prosecutors and judges refusing to take on intellectual-property cases where clear evidence of infringement has been presented. In this context, the Kuro case decision's tougher sentencing is a bit of good news but simply not enough to justify yet another upgrade.
The protection of intellectual property within Taiwan benefits all concerned. Taiwan's inventors are consistently the fourth most prolific, judging from patent registrations into the US, and strong protections would give confidence to companies considering R&D projects in Taiwan's new technology parks.
Effective trademark enforcement goes to the heart of protecting companies' hard-earned reputations and the common consumers' hard-earned dollars.
Meanwhile, increased protection against counterfeit alcohol-beverage, cosmetic and pharmaceutical products are essential to protecting the health of Taiwan's population. While there was some solid improvement right after the WTO accession, it is absolutely essential that Taiwan continue moving forwards to make this island a center for innovation instead of a well-protected haven for rampant piracy.
John Eastwood
Intellectual Property Rights Committee co-chair, European Chamber of Commerce Taipei
In a meeting with Haitian Minister of Foreign Affairs Jean-Victor Harvel Jean-Baptiste on Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) vowed to continue providing aid to Haiti. Taiwan supports Haiti with development in areas such as agriculture, healthcare and education through initiatives run by the Taiwan International Cooperation and Development Fund (ICDF). The nation it has established itself as a responsible, peaceful and innovative actor committed to global cooperation, Jean-Baptiste said. Testimonies such as this give Taiwan a voice in the global community, where it often goes unheard. Taiwan’s reception in Haiti also contrasts with how China has been perceived in countries in the region
On Monday, Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) delivered a welcome speech at the ILA-ASIL Asia-Pacific Research Forum, addressing more than 50 international law experts from more than 20 countries. With an aim to refute the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) claim to be the successor to the 1945 Chinese government and its assertion that China acquired sovereignty over Taiwan, Lin articulated three key legal positions in his speech: First, the Cairo Declaration and Potsdam Declaration were not legally binding instruments and thus had no legal effect for territorial disposition. All determinations must be based on the San Francisco Peace
On April 13, I stood in Nanan (南安), a Bunun village in southern Hualien County’s Jhuosi Township (卓溪), absorbing lessons from elders who spoke of the forest not as backdrop, but as living presence — relational, sacred and full of spirit. I was there with fellow international students from National Dong Hwa University (NDHU) participating in a field trip that would become one of the most powerful educational experiences of my life. Ten days later, a news report in the Taipei Times shattered the spell: “Formosan black bear shot and euthanized in Hualien” (April 23, page 2). A tagged bear, previously released
While global headlines often focus on the military balance in the Taiwan Strait or the promise of US intervention, there is a quieter, less visible battle that might ultimately define Taiwan’s future: the battle for intelligence autonomy. Despite widespread global adherence to the “one China” policy, Taiwan has steadily cultivated a unique political identity and security strategy grounded in self-reliance. This approach is not merely symbolic; it is a pragmatic necessity in the face of Beijing’s growing political warfare and infiltration campaigns, many orchestrated by the Chinese Ministry of State Security (MSS). Taiwan’s intelligence community did not emerge overnight. Its roots