Could a lie told a thousand times become a truth?
Yes, it could. That is what China believes in, and attempts to concoct regarding Taiwan's sovereignty. China has been entertaining vengeance against Japan and the West, for both have abused China in the past. Unable to take revenge on either country, China instead turned its anger on Taiwan, a small chip that China once abandoned and now claims as part of its territory. However, the claim stands on thin ice and must be refuted with facts.
Geometry says that a platform requires a minimum of three pillars to stand firmly on the globe. How many pillars support China's claim of title to Taiwan? Zero.
In 1895, by signing the Treaty of Shimonoseki with Japan as a result of defeat in a Sino-Japanese war, China ceded Taiwan to Japan in perpetuity, in addition to paying huge amounts of monetary compensation.
In 1943, the Cairo Declaration, a joint statement slightly better than a press release with no legal power, was issued expressing the common intent of restoring Taiwan to China after the war as a condition enticing China to pin down Japanese forces on the Asian continent.
In 1945, World War II ended with Japan's defeat and surrender to the Allied powers. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government was assigned by the Allied powers as their agent to administer Taiwan.
In 1949, defeated by the Chinese Communists, the KMT took refuge in Taiwan. The KMT was supposed to be an agent of the Allied powers, but they began a reign of terror. Meanwhile, the communists declared the establishment of the People's Republic of China (PRC) government in Beijing.
In 1950, the Korean War broke out. US president Harry Truman dispatched the Seventh Fleet to the Taiwan Strait.
In 1951, by signing the San Francisco Peace Treaty (SFPT), Japan renounced its title to Taiwan. That treaty, however, did not nullify the Treaty of Shimonoseki. In essence, Taiwan's legal status did not revert to what it was prior to the signing of the Treaty of Shimonoseki.
Furthermore, neither the Republic of China (ROC) government nor the PRC government represented the state of China in drafting or concluding the treaty. The treaty, which entered into effect in 1952, completely overrode the Cairo Declaration and excluded China from issues pertaining to Taiwan.
In 1952, after the SFPT took effect, the ROC government taking refuge in Taiwan signed a Treaty of Peace with Japan reaffirming the terms of SFPT. However, the ROC government was at that time not representing Taiwan in any legal capacity.
In 1971, the PRC government replaced the ROC government as the sole representative of China in the UN.
In 1972, following US president Richard Nixon's visit to China, the US government and the PRC government issued the Shanghai Communique. It contains, however, statements of disagreement in which both the US and China staked out incongruent positions. The US government only acknowledged that China claimed title to Taiwan.
In 1978, the PRC government signed a Treaty of Peace and Friendship with Japan. No provision of the treaty deals with title to Taiwan. In the same year, the US derecognized the ROC government and established formal diplomatic ties with the PRC government.
In 1979, the US Congress passed the Taiwan Relations Act, a domestic law for handling all affairs with Taiwan.
Given the condensed history and all known legal documents associated with those events, it is without doubt that Taiwan's sovereignty is as yet unsettled. No single state was ever conferred title to Formosa Taiwan since 1952.
No wonder China was unable to support its claim of reacquiring title to Taiwan in the Shanghai Communique of 1972, except by sneaking in a legally unsupportable statement that "Taiwan is a province of China which has long been returned to the motherland" to indulge itself.
Chinese people in the past hundred years have immersed themselves into a state of constantly seeking ways to shake off its humiliations at the hands of the West and Japan. The strong desire is understandable and respected. What is deplorable is the tactics they employ.
Imperial Russia sold Alaska to the US, a voluntary transaction which the succeeding Russian governments may regret but cannot revoke. By the same token, imperial China ceded Taiwan, considered an unruly island, to Japan in 1895 -- a deed that China can't revert.
It was a bitter pill that the state of China had to swallow to keep the rest of its territory intact. Neither ignoring its past misdeed nor attempting to whitewash well-documented international treaties will restore China's pride or glory. Whipping up nationalistic riots against Japanese interests or passing an Anti-Secession Law against the Taiwanese people will only ill serve China.
Taiwan was once a territory of China. So was Cuba once a territory of Spain, and New Mexico a part of Mexico. Claiming title to Taiwan by twisting historic facts, China may fool some people some times, but can never fool all the people all the time.
No, a lie told a thousand times never becomes a truth.
Cranbury, New Jersey
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has created a dilemma that could soon cause him to be hoisted with his own petard, bringing his leadership of China to an end. His threatening rhetoric over the unification of Taiwan with China, in which he has said, “we are willing to draw blood if necessary,” has placed Xi in a corner. Xi is portrayed as a strong world leader, yet he has created a scenario for himself that most likely would have an unfavorable outcome. With the 20th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) scheduled to convene this month, Xi cannot
Indian lawmaker Sujeet Kumar’s current 10-day visit to Taiwan is a landmark development in the relationship between two vibrant democracies. India has sulked about sending an official parliamentary delegation to Taiwan owning to its “one China” policy, which is now being questioned the world over, including in India’s political spectrum. Although Kumar is visiting Taiwan in a personal capacity, the visit carries huge political traction. Kumar does not belong to the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP); he belongs to regional political party Biju Janata Dal (BJD). Although BJD is an opposition party, it has always extended constructive issue-based support to
I was privileged to meet with many of Taiwan’s leaders and leading thinkers during a study tour visit in August. One theme I heard several times during that trip was that bad relations between the United States and China benefit Taiwan. At first thought, I empathize with the argument. After all, there is a troubling record of America’s leaders negotiating with Beijing over the heads of Taiwan’s leaders. For example, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt returned Taiwan to China after World War II. President Richard Nixon surprised Taiwan leaders with his 1972 trip to China. President Jimmy Carter unilaterally chose to normalize
Washington’s “one China” policy has not changed and the US does not take a position on Taiwan’s sovereignty issue, a US Department of State spokesperson has said. He said that this has been the principle of US policy toward Taiwan since 1979, and the policy has remained in effect. He also said that US Secretary of State Antony Blinken has privately made this clear to Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅). The US’ “one China” policy and China’s “one China” principle recognize China as the “representative of China.” The two diverge on the issue of Taiwan: Beijing asserts sovereignty