I was flabbergasted to read your report ("Students at risk of suicide," Aug. 7, page 3). In it, you write that according to a recent survey sponsored by the Taiwan Association of Clinical Psychiatrists, 10.21 percent of the students surveyed "have attempted suicide in the past year." Are you absolutely sure of this figure?
I have often found that students do not understand the literal meaning of "suicide" and "to commit suicide." I care very much about the fine distinctions here because the proper use of terminology affects attitudes and behavior. Don't you really mean that 10 percent of the students in the survey "have thought at one time or the other of taking their life," or "have had occasional suicidal thoughts"? Do you really mean that high a percentage of young people in the survey actually tried to do this awful thing? I find the notion very hard to believe.
During times of unusual stress, sadness or discouragement, or for persons suffering clinical depression, it may be natural for people to have a fleeting fantasy of say, hurling themselves in front of a passing car or of throwing away the precious gift of their own life. But thank heavens most of us recognize nonsense when we see it, and we let go of such fantasies or thoughts. We do not act on them.
Please tell us, then: does that survey really mean what you reported? Also, was the survey taken among a certain select group of young people, or was it a random survey? Finally, how was the survey conducted?
Father Daniel Bauer
Fu Jen Catholic University
[For answers to these questions, readers should try contacting the Taiwan Association of Clinical Psychiatrists, which conducted the survey, at 03-2653445. - Ed.]
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
A recent piece of international news has drawn surprisingly little attention, yet it deserves far closer scrutiny. German industrial heavyweight Siemens Mobility has reportedly outmaneuvered long-entrenched Chinese competitors in Southeast Asian infrastructure to secure a strategic partnership with Vietnam’s largest private conglomerate, Vingroup. The agreement positions Siemens to participate in the construction of a high-speed rail link between Hanoi and Ha Long Bay. German media were blunt in their assessment: This was not merely a commercial win, but has symbolic significance in “reshaping geopolitical influence.” At first glance, this might look like a routine outcome of corporate bidding. However, placed in
China often describes itself as the natural leader of the global south: a power that respects sovereignty, rejects coercion and offers developing countries an alternative to Western pressure. For years, Venezuela was held up — implicitly and sometimes explicitly — as proof that this model worked. Today, Venezuela is exposing the limits of that claim. Beijing’s response to the latest crisis in Venezuela has been striking not only for its content, but for its tone. Chinese officials have abandoned their usual restrained diplomatic phrasing and adopted language that is unusually direct by Beijing’s standards. The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs described the
RSS