The US House of Representatives on June 28 passed a foreign aid amendment bill barring the US Export-Import Bank from approving US$5 billion loans to build four nuclear power plants in China. The lawmakers introducing such a bill said that at the juncture when the US faces financial difficulties, using taxpayer money to assist China's development in this way is not only unreasonable, but dangerous. The sum of US$5 billion is a lot of money, but there is the prospect of supplying more than US$5 billion in equipment and facilities.
By the standards of Taiwan's pro-unification camp, turning down the loan is missing a great opportunity. They would see the situation as isolated from other events and take the attitude that "if I don't sell the goods or provide the loans, others will."
But the US House of Representatives voted a significant 334-114 margin to pass the amendment bill. These US lawmakers are not driven by ideological thinking, but instead take national security and the rights of all Americans as their top priority. It is only Taiwan's pro-unification lawmakers who insist on classifying "love of country" and "love of Taiwan" in completely ideological terms.
US lawmakers are certainly no fools. They, of course, understand that if they refuse China the money, other countries may lend it to them. But the US attitude is that if other countries lend the money to China, that is their business. The US is not only concerned with business opportunities, but safeguarding US interests and national security is more important than benefiting commercial interests.
On June 30, two days after the US House rejected the US$5 billion in foreign aid to China, it overwhelmingly voted 333-92 for an amendment bill and 398-15 for a non-binding resolution to press President George W. Bush to review the China National Offshore Oil Corp's (CNOOC) US$18.5 billion bid to purchase the US' Unocal Corp.
Representative Richard Pombo, a Republican, said that "Such a move may not be consistent with free market principles or in the best interest of US national security." Although this non-binding resolution expressing the House's position cannot compel the action of the US government, it is important for the two following reasons.
First, the resolution shows the US Congress' "concern for the US economy and security." Is it true that the rise of China has threatened the US economy and security? In fact, given the more than 10,000km between the US and China, China cannot have any substantial or immediate impact on the US economy. Besides, US$1.6 trillion of China's GDP is relatively insignificant compared to US$11.7 trillion of the US' GDP. Thus, there is still a long way for China to go if it wants to catch up with the US.
Despite this, US lawmakers still have to take precautions by giving China's potential threat careful thought in order to carry out their duties of supervising the government.
The other implication of the resolution is to remind the government that China's foreign trade policy does not conform with free-market principles. As a result, China should not be treated the same as other democratic countries while assessing international business takeovers. Not long ago, on April 6, the US Senate voted 67-33 to allow a vote on a bill that would impose a 27.5 percent penalty tariff on Chinese imports if China failed to revalue the yuan within six months.
This Senate resolution similarly revealed that the Chinese government has kept its yuan at an artificially low rate, violating free market principles in order to gain an unfair advantage in the world market.
We see that when faced with the threat from other nations, both the US Senate and House can jointly shoulder the responsibility to protect Americans and safeguard the national interest regardless of business interests.
We hope that the Legislative Yuan can emulate the spirit of the US Congress by making national security a top priority when making laws rather than changing their minds constantly because of "goodwill" gestures.
Further, we hope that our lawmakers can soon pass the draft of the sensitive scientific technology protection bill (
Meanwhile, we call on the Chinese government to revalue the yuan. If they do not, we should follow the US example and pass a law to demand the government take appropriate measures, such as revaluing the NT dollar. If this is done, not only will Taiwan's national security not be compromised, but it might even lead to another wave of Taiwan's economic miracle.
Huang tien-lin is a national policy adviser to the president.
TRANSLATED BY LIN YA-TI
Since the end of the Cold War, the US-China espionage battle has arguably become the largest on Earth. Spying on China is vital for the US, as China’s growing military and technological capabilities pose direct challenges to its interests, especially in defending Taiwan and maintaining security in the Indo-Pacific. Intelligence gathering helps the US counter Chinese aggression, stay ahead of threats and safeguard not only its own security, but also the stability of global trade routes. Unchecked Chinese expansion could destabilize the region and have far-reaching global consequences. In recent years, spying on China has become increasingly difficult for the US
Lately, China has been inviting Taiwanese influencers to travel to China’s Xinjiang region to make films, weaving a “beautiful Xinjiang” narrative as an antidote to the international community’s criticisms by creating a Potemkin village where nothing is awry. Such manipulations appear harmless — even compelling enough for people to go there — but peeling back the shiny veneer reveals something more insidious, something that is hard to ignore. These films are not only meant to promote tourism, but also harbor a deeper level of political intentions. Xinjiang — a region of China continuously listed in global human rights reports —
The annual summit of East Asia and other events around the ASEAN summit in October and November every year have become the most important gathering of leaders in the Indo-Pacific region. This year, as Laos is the chair of ASEAN, it was privileged to host all of the ministerial and summit meetings associated with ASEAN. Besides the main summit, this included the high-profile East Asia Summit, ASEAN summits with its dialogue partners and the ASEAN Plus Three Summit with China, Japan and South Korea. The events and what happens around them have changed over the past 15 years from a US-supported, ASEAN-led
To the dismay of the Chinese propaganda machine, President William Lai (賴清德) has been mounting an information offensive through his speeches. No longer are Taiwanese content with passively reacting to China’s encroachment in the international window of discourse, but Taiwan is now setting the tone and pace of conversation. Last month, Lai’s statement that “If China wants Taiwan it should also take back land from Russia” made international headlines, pointing out the duplicity of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) revanchism. History shows that the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) stance on regional territorial disputes has not been consistent. The early CCP
RSS