The year-end county commissioner elections should primarily be a rivalry between the two largest political parties, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). But, recently, the Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) has nominated its own candidates.
The TSU is not seeking to win at the polls, but rather aims to prove to the DPP that it still exists and should not be ignored. This will give it room to bargain with the DPP, and also serve as preparation for the legislative elections in 2007, where it risks being obliterated by the "single-member district" legislative electoral system that will come into effect at that time.
Lee Hsien-jen (
He suggested that the TSU might want to alter its tactics, since the party would eventually have to deal with China rather than isolate itself from cross-strait exchanges.
I believe that the prospect of the "single-member district" system is forcing the TSU to become more moderate, as the system will be slanted against more radical candidates, but I wonder whether this is the right way for the TSU to escape from its current predicament.
The TSU has an interesting history. It was founded by former president Lee Teng-hui (
By drawing off KMT members of the localization faction, it was intended to weaken the KMT and help the DPP. Its stance on Taiwan's independence was between that of the DPP and the KMT, in other words, it was originally less radical than the DPP.
The establishment of the party coincided with the announcement of President Chen Shui-bian's (
As a result, the DPP was losing appeal, and faced combined pressure from the failure of its new "middle road" and its indifferent administrative record.
In the run up to last year's presidential elections, the TSU was able to come to its aid with its "Alliance to Campaign for the Rectification of the Name of Taiwan," and the "228 Hand-in-Hand Rally" and other campaigns to promote Taiwanese consciousness, helping to avert a DPP defeat.
From the perspective of its history, we can see that the TSU is faced with a dilemma. If it waters down its independence platform, it will lose its appeal, but if it becomes more radical, it will outpace many of its supporters.
But whatever the circumstance, to weaken its pro-independence position as a means of winning votes is unrealistic. For a small party like the TSU, to water down its platform will simply make its grassroots supporters wonder what distinguishes it from the DPP, which it would be more advantageous to support.
For those who have always supported the DPP, they will feel that, as the TSU has admitted it was mistaken, their decision not to shift their support to the TSU was the right decision.
In fact, we can cay that the TSU made the same mistake that Chen did when he announced his new "middle road" as a ploy to appeal to appeal to the mainstream public in Taipei.
In the end, not only will the TSU fail to win more support, but could endanger its own existence. Some of its members may transfer their support to a more radical party, as former DPP members transferred to the TSU, and though the probability is not as high, it is still a possibility.
It will be difficult for the TSU to deal with the threat posed by the "single-member district," but its current strategies are misguided. We will have to see what they can do to escape this predicament while keeping their ideals intact.
Lin Cho-shui is a Democratic Progressive Party legislator.
TRANSLATED BY LIN YA-TI
With escalating US-China competition and mutual distrust, the trend of supply chain “friend shoring” in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fragmentation of the world into rival geopolitical blocs, many analysts and policymakers worry the world is retreating into a new cold war — a world of trade bifurcation, protectionism and deglobalization. The world is in a new cold war, said Robin Niblett, former director of the London-based think tank Chatham House. Niblett said he sees the US and China slowly reaching a modus vivendi, but it might take time. The two great powers appear to be “reversing carefully
Taiwan is facing multiple economic challenges due to internal and external pressures. Internal challenges include energy transition, upgrading industries, a declining birthrate and an aging population. External challenges are technology competition between the US and China, international supply chain restructuring and global economic uncertainty. All of these issues complicate Taiwan’s economic situation. Taiwan’s reliance on fossil fuel imports not only threatens the stability of energy supply, but also goes against the global trend of carbon reduction. The government should continue to promote renewable energy sources such as wind and solar power, as well as energy storage technology, to diversify energy supply. It
Former Japanese minister of defense Shigeru Ishiba has been elected as president of the governing Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) and would be approved as prime minister in parliament today. Ishiba is a familiar face for Taiwanese, as he has visited the nation several times. His popularity among Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) lawmakers has grown as a result of his multiple meetings and encounters with legislators and prominent figures in the government. The DPP and the LDP have close ties and have long maintained warm relations. Ishiba in August 2020 praised Taiwan’s
On Thursday last week, the International Crisis Group (ICG) issued a well-researched report titled “The Widening Schism across the Taiwan Strait,” which focused on rising tensions between Taiwan and China, making a number of recommendations on how to avoid conflict. While it is of course laudable that a respected international organization such as the ICG is willing to think through possible avenues toward a peaceful resolution, the report contains a couple of fundamental flaws in the way it approaches the issue. First, it attempts to present a “balanced approach” by pushing back equally against Taiwan’s perceived transgressions as against Beijing’s military threats