I found Chang Hsi-mo's article ("China must collapse for Russia to stay united," May 28, page 8) to be very interesting. I am a Canadian university student who is very interested in global politics, especially those of Russia and developments in China. I have been to both of these countries. I am also a strong pro-Taiwan independence supporter.
I do agree that the fate of Russia is tied to China. As China grows stronger, and the energy and resource problems it has already started to experience grow more numerous and more severe, it will inevitably look north into Russia and east into former Soviet Central Asia for land, resources and political influence.
As long as it is dependent upon Russia for energy and raw material and is surrounded on two sides by potentially hostile states, China can never be a superpower. It will seek to set up a buffer zone as the Soviets (and to some extent the Americans) did in the Cold War. And it will seek to acquire a reliable source of raw materials.
This will obviously bring it into conflict with Russia, either directly or in the former Soviet regions, and the relative strengths of both of the states will determine the outcome of such a conflict. I believe that it is not just a Chinese collapse that would strengthen Russia, but a strong China may threaten it in the long run.
However, though a dramatic political shift must take place to "save" Russia, China is not the only country from which such a shift could occur, as Chang advocated in the article. Europe was divided between the superpowers after World War II for half a century and is now striving to find itself politically. It is still unclear what form the EU, the world's largest economy, will take on the world stage. Or even what form the EU itself will take on the map and where its boundaries will be drawn.
But one thing that is clear is that whatever its choice, it will dramatically change the world situation and the situation inside Russia.
Russia's admittance into the EU (or whatever organization it evolves into) is inevitable, as ultimately they need each other.
Europe needs the raw materials and the energy, while Russia is inevitably on a "march to the West" and will not have arrived until it is readmitted into the Europe it left in 1917. When this occurs, Russia will be seen completely differently by former Soviet states and by Asia, as they will realize that Russia is their ticket to the West, to prosperity and freedom, to the "American lifestyle" which they all are desperate for.
Evidence of this includes the three recent "orange, velvet and rose" revolutions in which new regimes swept to power for the simple reason that they were "pro-Western" in a very abstract sense. Even though none of the voters knew exactly what they stood for, they supported them because they seemed to be more Western-oriented than what the people had before.
The West won the Cold War. If Russia joins the EU, and therefore the West, it will reverse the disintegration trend and nations such as Kazakhstan will be begging to join the federation -- and regions such as Bashkortostan, Tatarstan, Sakha, Tuva, Karelia and Kalmykija would abandon all thoughts of leaving it.
For the most part I agree with Chang's arguments, and I commend him, for few writers are bold enough to say that the fate of one great nation is dependent on the collapse of another.
Mike Pazaratz
Canada
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
Liberals have wasted no time in pointing to Karol Nawrocki’s lack of qualifications for his new job as president of Poland. He has never previously held political office. He won by the narrowest of margins, with 50.9 percent of the vote. However, Nawrocki possesses the one qualification that many national populists value above all other: a taste for physical strength laced with violence. Nawrocki is a former boxer who still likes to go a few rounds. He is also such an enthusiastic soccer supporter that he reportedly got the logos of his two favorite teams — Chelsea and Lechia Gdansk —
RSS