I would like to applaud President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) call to the public to "switch off and save" ("Switch off and save," July 1, page 2), and his support for the "Switching off on the Summer Solstice" energy-saving campaign. Taiwan's overwhelming reliance on imported energy means that all members of society will need to find ways to conserve what Taiwan does not have in abundance.
Taiwan relies on energy imports for greater than 90 percent of its energy needs which is an unhealthy and already precarious dependence on dwindling foreign energy resources.
With that said, I was shocked to read a declaration ("Price hikes are necessary, new Taipower chief says," July 3, page 3) by incoming Taipower chairman Morgan Hwang (
He then said that the time had come to seriously consider price hikes to encourage citizens to take conservation seriously.
Being a Canadian, I grew up in a country that is blessed with an abundance of cheap energy. Canadians have long taken this for granted, and sadly our per-capita energy use leads the world.
However, this does not mean that we do not do our part to conserve energy. In Canada we rely on an intricate system of doors and windows to keep heat in and cold out or vice-versa, depending on the season.
It works like this: When you pass through a door, close it behind you. If your business or home does not have a door then consider investing in one. You will recoup the cost of the doors and windows when you consider how much you will be saving on your energy bills over the long-term.
If you are worried that you are shutting yourself off from your friends or customers, do not despair -- glass doors and windows are now available, too!
Personally, I enjoy the fact that I can walk down numerous shopping streets here in Chiayi in virtually air-conditioned comfort due to the open storefronts.
However, citizens and merchants need to realize that this wasteful practice will need to change since Taiwan's reliance on seemingly inexpensive energy cannot last forever.
Bjorn Petersen
Chiayi
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
RSS