The shallow logic behind Scott Austin's letter (June 25, page 8) is mind-boggling.
We all agree that proficiency in English is very important in this global economy. However, English is not the only thing that makes the world go around. In Taiwan and in the US, I've found that an average Filipino speaks better English than a Chinese, Korean or Japanese. Using Austin's logic, the Philippines should be the economic powerhouse of Asia, but it's not.
Moreover, we are living at a time of "minimal profitability." Profit margins for goods and services, from DRAM to LCD panels, are becoming razor thin. When a company like Dell or Nokia "outsource" their research and development, they hire Taiwanese because this is where they can find the best engineering talent at the most affordable price.
If these multinational firms are simply looking for English proficiency in engineers, they could have set up shops in Livermore, California.
Even jobs that require adequate English proficiency are being outsourced to countries like India. For example, Dell has recently set up "call centers" in Bangalore, India, for product support. If English proficiency is the end of all things, Dell would have set up a call center in Boise, Idaho instead.
Putting English proficiency aside, I believe the key to Taiwan's future success lies in its ability to transform from a manufacturing-based economy to a R&D-based economy. We have witnessed the recent success of South Korea in this endeavor, as demonstrated by brands like Samsung, and that country's robust stem-cell research. Ironically, as of last year, Chinese has replaced English as the most sought-after foreign language on Korean college campuses.
Finally, here is some food for thought. The US will probably be the biggest consumer market in the world for many years to come. At the same time, Hispanics are the fastest growing ethnic group in the US. In states like California, Texas and Florida, Spanish has already become an integral part of the American experience. With a torrid birth rate and a wide-open US-Mexico border, it's estimated that by 2030, there will be 100 million Hispanics in the southwestern US alone. In order to tap into this enormous consumer market, shall we give "Spanish proficiency" some thought?
Kenny Liu
Hualien
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In the opening remarks of her meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on Friday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) framed her visit as a historic occasion. In his own remarks, Xi had also emphasized the history of the relationship between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Where they differed was that Cheng’s account, while flawed by its omissions, at least partially corresponded to reality. The meeting was certainly historic, albeit not in the way that Cheng and Xi were signaling, and not from the perspective
RSS