If one report is correct, 70 percent of Taiwanese people support the arms procurement bill, but the bill is continually obstructed by pan-blue camp legislators (Time running out on arms bill, May 24, page 8).
The Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) should initiate a grass roots protest against every legislator who opposes the bill at their offices and even at their homes. Start with the pan-blue procedure committee members, who won't even let the bill make it to the legislative floor.
In southern Taiwan, where Taiwanese consciousness is strong, a grass roots "revolution" is needed to let these legislators know who they are supposed to be representing. It is the people they represent, not the party, not their chairmen. They are paid by the people, not their party. They must serve the people, not their party.
For blue camp legislators, particularly the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), their legislative seats might be bought with illegitimate party assets. But they still have to be elected by the people. For the next three years, probably the only way to pressure these legislators is to let them know who their masters are. It is the people, not the KMT, not the People First Party (PFP), not KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
Chen Ming-chung
Chicago, Illinois
US weapons not good enough
Your editorial "Time running out on arms bill" (May 24, page 8) ignores a significant function, as well as a responsibility, of the legislature. Its role is one of oversight. It's not deniable that the conflict between major political parties in Taiwan are so acute that the interests of these parties are inevitably involved in legislative process and influence the passage of bills.
However, the pan-blue camp plays the crucial role of overseeing the government, in this case on national security issues. As national security is a priority that surmounts political considerations, the blue-camp realizes that the arms bill does little to improve Taiwan's defenses, but rather, burns the taxpayers' money like oil.
Therefore, characterizing their obstruction of the arms bill as a continuation of the competition between parties or an emotional boycott against the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government is a misinterpretation of their role in the legislature.
What should be passed in the legislature must be the best policies that have endured a cost-benefit analysis. Even if the arms bill is passed today, these weapons will not arrive or be ready for operation for months or years. While the military expenditure of China is rising each year, Taiwan cannot afford either to engage in an arms race, or waste money on improper military procurement.
To sum up, what the overseeing side concerns itself with is quality. We do need to buy weaponry, but what we need is weapons that are able to make a great contribution to our defense.
Tzung Han Lu
Taipei
A return to power for former US president Donald Trump would pose grave risks to Taiwan’s security, autonomy and the broader stability of the Indo-Pacific region. The stakes have never been higher as China aggressively escalates its pressure on Taiwan, deploying economic, military and psychological tactics aimed at subjugating the nation under Beijing’s control. The US has long acted as Taiwan’s foremost security partner, a bulwark against Chinese expansionism in the region. However, a second Trump presidency could upend decades of US commitments, introducing unpredictability that could embolden Beijing and severely compromise Taiwan’s position. While president, Trump’s foreign policy reflected a transactional
There appears to be a growing view among leaders and leading thinkers in Taiwan that their words and actions have no influence over how China approaches cross-Strait relations. According to this logic, China’s actions toward Taiwan are guided by China’s unwavering ambition to assert control over Taiwan. Many also believe Beijing’s approach is influenced by China’s domestic politics. As the thinking goes, former President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) made a good faith effort to demonstrate her moderation on cross-Strait issues throughout her tenure. During her 2016 inaugural address, Tsai sent several constructive signals, including by acknowledging the historical fact of interactions and
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has prioritized modernizing the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to rival the US military, with many experts believing he would not act on Taiwan until the PLA is fully prepared to confront US forces. At the Chinese Communist Party’s 20th Party Congress in 2022, Xi emphasized accelerating this modernization, setting 2027 — the PLA’s centennial — as the new target, replacing the previous 2035 goal. US intelligence agencies said that Xi has directed the PLA to be ready for a potential invasion of Taiwan by 2027, although no decision on launching an attack had been made. Whether
Taiwanese men doing their alternative military service within Taipei’s and Taichung’s Department of Compulsory Military Service independently reported outlandish incidents of brainwashing. Below is a story related to propagandizing as it manifests overseas. One of my Chinese friends and a group of Taiwanese friends set off together from Sydney, Australia, in a tour group to northern Europe. The travel agency arranged for a Chinese tour guide to lead the group. The guide would start off on a propaganda blitz every afternoon at a set time, singing the praises of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The Taiwanese members of the tour seemed