It is disappointing to read Ted Galen Carpenter's article ("Preserving the `status quo' brings risk with it," Apr 20, 2005, page 8), in which he laid out the differences in Taiwan, the US and China's definitions of the "status quo." He ended the article by warning of a danger. No insights, no solution.
People in Taiwan have been talking about the "status quo" since 1972 when Chiang Kai-shek's (
The truth is that there is no status quo in the universe. If there were a status quo to be gotten, the cosmetic industry and all those anti-aging industries would not have existed. A youthful, vibrant teenager will eventually become a heap of dried bones, in spite of all the sweating exercise and vitamins; no status quo exists for one single second.
Why not freeze April 2005 as the status quo that should be maintained? Or, maybe the year 2002 when China pointed "only" 350 missiles to Taiwan as opposed to 700 now? Better yet, let's keep the status quo of 1976, when China locked itself in its own house and didn't bother its neighbors.
The key fact is that China is changing the "status quo" every day with its military build-up and Sun Tzu (
The Taiwanese people have to face the fact that there is no status quo to be maintained. Most importantly, we as a people have to face the truth that we have three choices: (1) side with the US in the US-China conflict, (2) side with China against the US or (3) achieve a credible neutrality backed by our own will and power. There are no other options!
The third option would take many generations to achieve. For this generation, there are only two options: live and die for the US or live and die for China.
If we don't proactively make a conscious strategic choice, we will be dragged into the middle and have the worst of both worlds. If we choose to side with China, let's negotiate the best terms with China and forget about the US. If we choose the US, let's also tell the US that we don't want to hear the constant, untrue public belittlement that we, the Taiwanese, "are asking the Americans to die for us."
We want a fair deal.
Sing Young
Taoyuan
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
RSS