It is disappointing to read Ted Galen Carpenter's article ("Preserving the `status quo' brings risk with it," Apr 20, 2005, page 8), in which he laid out the differences in Taiwan, the US and China's definitions of the "status quo." He ended the article by warning of a danger. No insights, no solution.
People in Taiwan have been talking about the "status quo" since 1972 when Chiang Kai-shek's (
The truth is that there is no status quo in the universe. If there were a status quo to be gotten, the cosmetic industry and all those anti-aging industries would not have existed. A youthful, vibrant teenager will eventually become a heap of dried bones, in spite of all the sweating exercise and vitamins; no status quo exists for one single second.
Why not freeze April 2005 as the status quo that should be maintained? Or, maybe the year 2002 when China pointed "only" 350 missiles to Taiwan as opposed to 700 now? Better yet, let's keep the status quo of 1976, when China locked itself in its own house and didn't bother its neighbors.
The key fact is that China is changing the "status quo" every day with its military build-up and Sun Tzu (
The Taiwanese people have to face the fact that there is no status quo to be maintained. Most importantly, we as a people have to face the truth that we have three choices: (1) side with the US in the US-China conflict, (2) side with China against the US or (3) achieve a credible neutrality backed by our own will and power. There are no other options!
The third option would take many generations to achieve. For this generation, there are only two options: live and die for the US or live and die for China.
If we don't proactively make a conscious strategic choice, we will be dragged into the middle and have the worst of both worlds. If we choose to side with China, let's negotiate the best terms with China and forget about the US. If we choose the US, let's also tell the US that we don't want to hear the constant, untrue public belittlement that we, the Taiwanese, "are asking the Americans to die for us."
We want a fair deal.
Sing Young
Taoyuan
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
RSS