China's anti-Japanese campaign has been growing. The major reason behind it is to stop Japan from becoming a permanent member of the UN Security Council. Other issues such as textbook changes and "comfort women" are mere excuses.
China's loudest campaign slogan is: A Japan that does not review its invasion of China and that has no credibility in Asia is absolutely not qualified to represent Asia on the council. In fact, Beijing has already shown its support for Germany, which is also currently striving for a permanent seat.
Japan-US alliance
This is because the US and Japan are the largest obstacles to China's "unification."
In early February, the US-Japan Security Consultative Committee even publicly stated for the very first time that it would "encourage the peaceful resolution of issues concerning the Taiwan Strait through dialogue."
In light of the positive relations between Taiwan and Japan at the moment, China believes that Japan may "collude" with the US if it becomes a permanent member of the security council, making the issue of Taiwan tougher.
This is why Beijing has launched a large-scale anti-Japanese movement. In other words, it has linked historical problems to Japan's bid for a permanent seat.
Further, issues such as the sovereignty dispute over the Diaoyutai Islands, and the conflicts over oil and gas development in the East China Sea, add to China's desire that Japan not become a leading political power.
All of these factors are closely related to the two countries' national security and energy strategy.
Political pressure
Obviously, if Japan becomes a permanent member and stands side-by-side with the US in international politics, the political pressure on China will become greater.
As a result, it may be difficult to restrain China's anti-Japanese sentiment.
Last Sunday, Japanese Foreign Minister Nobutaka Machimura arrived in Beijing for an exchange of opinions with Chinese Foreign Minister Li Zhaoxing (李肇星).
Today, Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi will attend an Asia-Africa summit in Indonesia, and he is expected to meet Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤).
They will certainly talk about the current anti-Japanese protests.
The anti-Japanese movement will inevitably affect the two countries' trade and economies. In recent years, Japan has sold an enormous amount of steel to China.
compatible economies
Some Japanese people have even said that China saved Japan's steel industry.
Nevertheless, China has also made a fortune from Japan. While it makes use of Japan's capital and technology, Japan also leverages China's relatively cheap laborer and materials. So the two countries are economically complementary to each other.
Still, it may be hard to remedy historical hatred and ethnic emotions in a short period of time. Sino-Japanese relations may improve after the meeting between Hu and Koizumi, but China's anti-Japanese sentiment is like a ticking bomb that may explode at anytime.
The situation depends completely on Japan's introspection and efforts, as well as China's self-restraint.
Chen Peng-jen is the director of the Graduate Institute of Japanese Studies at Chinese Culture University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS