To all the freedom fighters who stepped out to the March 26 rally, I wish to congratulate you. You did what you had to do! Yes, whether you are pan-green, purple or yellow (unless of course you are pan-blue) you figured it out and recognized that freedom is the common denominator. It was the battlefield of your choice and you stepped onto it with brave, heavy and determined hearts. Your statement was made; but it was not as loud as it could have been and this is regrettable. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) claims Taiwan is free and sovereign yet its actions say otherwise. It was a no-show.
An overwhelming statement would have lessened the likelihood that Taiwan will have to fight, shed blood or lose children just to keep this country the way it has been built. At least the statement was recorded and must be taken into consideration amongst high-powered friends and nations with any sort of consciousness or self-worth. When the question of whether to "intervene" or not arises, perhaps nations will remember and help Taiwan sooner rather than later.
The stage was set on March 26. The chance to say the "status quo" is unsatisfactory and that freedom will be Taiwan's only path came and went. Where was KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
Imagine if 10 million people had emerged onto the streets, in every city, town or village on March 26. It's a shame it didn't happen and wasn't organized. It would have been a signal not even CNN could have ignored it or been confused! With a little luck, CNN might even have led the story with a truthful reminder of the mob that threatened ethnic division last year at the request of the pan-blue leaders.
If I recall, Chinese leaders reveled in the mayhem and said that intervention was an option. Intervention? Yes, well, thanks for the help, Beijing, but our building is taller than yours and you may find the beaches unfriendly!
Instead of Lien standing in front of a sign stating "Democracy is Dead" and looking bitter and confused last year after losing millions of votes on a double ticket with People First Party Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜), he should have stepped down as leader. This would have brought stability to a country, which he claimed needed it. He would have joined the march if even a fraction of what he said was true. Now, the KMT is in China making side deals with Chinese officials, getting noticed and preparing for the "merger."
The pan-blues cry "We are a Nation, why should a Chinese law effect us?" But US laws affect Canada. Do Chinese laws not affect Hong Kong in a "de facto" manner? Such a simplistic understanding and excuse is unforgivable! China's new law has no inhibitions about its intent or imagined outcome. Taiwan will be, sooner or later, a part of China's regime.
Surely there is little to argue about when it comes to the "Pact of Aggression" that China has signed into law. "Pact" in the sense that the Chinese Communist Party is rife with military cronies and political opportunists armed with ideological hubris. They are tyrants intoxicated by their own ignorance. They bully countries to sustain their fictitious, aggressive and clearly erroneous power and position over Taiwan. But most of all; they remain rulers without a mandate.
If a KMT politician or supporter can look you in the eye and tell you that they are not fundamentally opposed to such a law, then they cannot be argued with. Leave them. They hope Beijing prevails upon its course of "tough love," which in the end amounts to communism.
"China's Taiwan Governor," how would that sound for a title? Would he be here to serve the "Protectorate of Taiwan," and without an army, how so? Let's stop pretending Taiwan is free and sovereign and finally say the following: Without democracy there can be no deal and that means war! US policy argues no one should make moves to alter the status quo unless those moves involve peaceful resolution. Well, no democratic nation has ever attacked another democratic nation, and that's a fact.
Forget about "A-bian." Don't mistake this phenomenon with his personal cause. Decide if it is your own! Decide if you accept a foreign government to serve as your own. Decide if you want your children to face the future with uncertainty. Think about whether or not you accept being forced to make a decision with a gun to your head!
Taiwan will lose an arms race. Unlike Russia, Taiwan will not fragment and splinter, she will be swallowed. Each day counts towards Taiwan's last or ironically, first day of the future. The battlefield conditions change with each passing year and to find favor on the field, Taiwan must choose the time and place, not China.
The situation has never looked so ripe for a statement that would never have been forgotten. Peace and the freedom to choose were and are universally desired in this country. People and politicians may be divided on many issues, but for your children, freedom should not be one of them.
Keith Justik
Taipei
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
Strategic thinker Carl von Clausewitz has said that “war is politics by other means,” while investment guru Warren Buffett has said that “tariffs are an act of war.” Both aphorisms apply to China, which has long been engaged in a multifront political, economic and informational war against the US and the rest of the West. Kinetically also, China has launched the early stages of actual global conflict with its threats and aggressive moves against Taiwan, the Philippines and Japan, and its support for North Korea’s reckless actions against South Korea that could reignite the Korean War. Former US presidents Barack Obama
RSS