In recent statements, Mainland Affairs Council Chairman Joseph Wu (吳釗燮) said that the 10-point agreement between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is "totally empty," and "contains hidden traps that could destroy Taiwan." Is the agreement and its potential consequences really that serious?
What does bear consideration is that each and every one of the points in the agreement are things the government should do for the people of Taiwan, but has failed to do so.
The Chen Shui-bian (
As a result of the negotiations between the KMT and the CCP, the cross-strait situation has certainly changed. With both KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and People First Party Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) planning to visit China in the not-too-distant future, the cross-strait relationship will certainly change even more.
As the government cannot stop these things from happening, nor stop the changes in the cross-strait situation, they should take control of them. They shouldn't be wasting their time just being critical.
If the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) wants to win back control over cross-strait policy, it is really not that difficult. For example, Chen could hold discussions with all party leaders on cross-strait policy, or simply talk to Lien and Soong before they leave for China. Even if they should refuse to attend discussions with the president, the fault would not lie with Chen. Moreover, by extending an invitation, Chen could show everyone that he is still in charge of cross-strait matters.
If a meeting of political leaders does not happen, the DPP can bring the discussions down a level, suggesting a meeting of party officials responsible for cross-strait affairs. If this too does not take place, the DPP might suggest to affiliated think tanks that a symposium be organized with groups associated with the opposition parties.
By bringing different opinions together, a report presenting policy recommendations can be produced. If the opposition parties or their affiliated think tanks refuse to cooperate, the public will be critical; whoever takes charge of integrating divergent views on cross-strait relations will take the leading role in directing the relationship. Once the DPP takes the initiative, it will be in an advantageous position.
As president, Chen can also call a national security or other high-level conference and publish its findings, after which he could publicly invite China to engage in negotiations on these issues. If Beijing should refuse, all the world would see China for what it really is. Chen would also gain credibility as a national leader who transcends party boundaries.
But there are two pre-conditions for this. First, such talks should be called soon, prior to Lien's or Soong's China visit. Secondly, they must be initiated by the president, so that their impact will be both domestic and international. Only if the president makes a move will the DPP be able to win back control over cross-strait policy.
I am afraid that the DPP will fail to act, isolating itself from new trends in the cross-strait process and watching helplessly as opposition politicians visit China, only able to utter meaningless criticisms similar to those made by Wu.
Wang Chien-chuang is the president of The Journalist magazine.
Translated by Ian Bartholomew
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS