On March 14, 2005, China promulgated an "Anti-Secession" Law with a vote of 2,896 to zero at its National People's Congress. The Anti-Secession Law authorizes China to "employ and execute non-peaceful means" against Taiwan when the Chinese president deems necessary to bring Taiwan into their authoritarian fold.
The intended application of this law is clearly targeted at not only Taiwan, but the US.
The motivation and contents are nothing but barbaric, malicious, and peace-threatening. It is a revival of historical Chinese imperialism.
We could handle this situation in various ways. We could leave it alone. After all, it is a domestic Chinese law. The People's Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan in history. Nor does this law have any jurisdiction over Taiwan.
Unfortunately, this do-nothing approach may encourage China to continually bully Taiwan and misbehave on the world stage. It could lead to increased instability and military conflict in the western Pacific.
We should not underestimate China's propensity toward brutal aggression. China invaded and occupied Tibet in 1959 and killed more than one million Tibetans. China attacked India in October 1962 and held a hostile relationship with India for nearly two decades. China wants its people to forget about its invasion of Vietnam in February 1979 by erasing it from their official history.
But the Taiwanese should not forget. The deployment of more than 700 Chinese missiles aimed at Taiwan is a persistent threat to peace.
It appears that China was a peace-loving country when it was weak, and an arrogant and offensive one when it was strong.
But this new law could backfire. The Bush administration and Congress have expressed a heightened concern.
And the US has apparently imposed pressure on the EU, which is expected to delay its plan to lift the embargo of selling advanced weapon systems to China -- at least until next year.
Ultimately, a more pragmatic and peaceful approach is for the international community to re-evaluate the ever-popular "one-China" policy.
It is unrealistic and nightmarish, but most of all the "one-China" policy is detrimental to the Taiwanese people's fundamental right to self-determination, which has been trampled by various imperial powers since the early seventeenth century.
The international community should help foster negotiations between China and Taiwan so that peace across the Taiwan Strait can be ensured and further development advanced.
Donald Shih
St. Louis, Missouri
In an article published in Newsweek on Monday last week, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged China to retake territories it lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. “If it is really for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t China take back Russia?” Lai asked, referring to territories lost in 1858 and 1860. The territories once made up the two flanks of northern Manchuria. Once ceded to Russia, they became part of the Russian far east. Claims since then have been made that China and Russia settled the disputes in the 1990s through the 2000s and that “China
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Trips to the Kenting Peninsula in Pingtung County have dredged up a lot of public debate and furor, with many complaints about how expensive and unreasonable lodging is. Some people even call it a tourist “butchering ground.” Many local business owners stake claims to beach areas by setting up parasols and driving away people who do not rent them. The managing authority for the area — Kenting National Park — has long ignored the issue. Ultimately, this has affected the willingness of domestic travelers to go there, causing tourist numbers to plummet. In 2008, Taiwan opened the door to Chinese tourists and in
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does