Great editorial regarding the French push to sell weapons to China ("French perfidy must be challenged," March 14, p. 8). My thanks to the EU Referendum weblog for making me aware of your piece.
I don't know what the French want to accomplish with this, but frankly I and many Americans are tired of them. Selling arms to Beijing is both inexcusably irresponsible and undoubtedly immoral, two traits that seem to drive French foreign policy these days.
I was born in Taipei to a Taiwanese mother and a father who's retired from the US Air Force, so this is very personal to me. Those arms the French seem so determined to sell to China will be pointed at my relatives and those US servicemen and women who will be sent to defend them if the need arises.
While I hope your government is conscious of the US need for Chinese cooperation in resolving this nuclear crisis in North Korea, it is right for the Taiwanese people to declare their independence if and when they choose. It is also the obligation of other democratic peoples to come to a country's defense when its freedom is threatened.
Speaking as an American, I believe the Bush administration will do just that, with overwhelming support from the US public. But unfortunately, if China's bullying moves from rhetoric to action, we know whose side the French will be on. As in Iraq, when given the choice between freedom and dictatorship, the French are nothing if not consistent in their choices.
Just to let you know, I've written to my congressional representative Duke Cunningham asking him to see if Congress can put added pressure on the French. Isn't democracy great! Too bad the French seem to have forgotten that!
Tom Powell
San Diego, California
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
RSS