Great editorial regarding the French push to sell weapons to China ("French perfidy must be challenged," March 14, p. 8). My thanks to the EU Referendum weblog for making me aware of your piece.
I don't know what the French want to accomplish with this, but frankly I and many Americans are tired of them. Selling arms to Beijing is both inexcusably irresponsible and undoubtedly immoral, two traits that seem to drive French foreign policy these days.
I was born in Taipei to a Taiwanese mother and a father who's retired from the US Air Force, so this is very personal to me. Those arms the French seem so determined to sell to China will be pointed at my relatives and those US servicemen and women who will be sent to defend them if the need arises.
While I hope your government is conscious of the US need for Chinese cooperation in resolving this nuclear crisis in North Korea, it is right for the Taiwanese people to declare their independence if and when they choose. It is also the obligation of other democratic peoples to come to a country's defense when its freedom is threatened.
Speaking as an American, I believe the Bush administration will do just that, with overwhelming support from the US public. But unfortunately, if China's bullying moves from rhetoric to action, we know whose side the French will be on. As in Iraq, when given the choice between freedom and dictatorship, the French are nothing if not consistent in their choices.
Just to let you know, I've written to my congressional representative Duke Cunningham asking him to see if Congress can put added pressure on the French. Isn't democracy great! Too bad the French seem to have forgotten that!
Tom Powell
San Diego, California
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to