US President George W. Bush's decision to appoint John Bolton as ambassador to the UN, while controversial, is meant to send a clear signal to the international body that it is time for reform.
Bolton, a long time critic of the UN and currently the State Department's top diplomat for weapons nonproliferation, has been outspoken in blasting the organization for being ineffective and not conducive to US interests.
"There is nobody in the [Bush] administration that takes the issue of United Nations reform more seriously than John Bolton and you can be sure he will not shy away from speaking his mind," said Brett Schaefer, a diplomatic analyst at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative Washington think tank.
Bush's selection surprised officials at the UN and in Europe at a time when he is trying to rehabilitate trans-Atlantic alliances badly damaged during his first four years in office over the Iraq War. It reinforces the perception that Bush is a unilateralist unconcerned with the views of the US' closest friends.
Bolton is known for speaking his mind and is strongly supported by Vice President Dick Cheney, who lobbied for his position in the State Department over the objections of the more moderate and then-secretary of state Colin Powell.
US conservatives, especially within Congress, have been pushing for change at the UN, and for years blocked the payment of US dues until after the Sept. 11 attacks.
Bolton has long shared their view, emphasizing in 1994 the importance of the US in leading the world, rather than the UN that can rarely agree on a single policy, leaving it incapable of acting decisively.
"There is no such thing as the UN," he said, according to the Washington Post. "There is an international community that occasionally can be led by the only real power in the world, and that is the United States, when it suits our interest and we can get others to go along."
His appointment, which must be approved by the Senate, has raised objections at home. Opposition Democrats have vowed to fight the nomination in the Senate and some Republicans have expressed reservations. Forty-three Democrats voted against his posting as undersecretary at the State Department four years ago. Six voted, however, crossed party lines and voted for him.
Democratic Senator Joseph Biden, the ranking minority leader on the chamber's Foreign Relations Committee, said he was puzzled by Bush's choice.
"In light of the president's recent efforts to reach out to allies and the international community, I'm surprised at the choice of John Bolton to be our UN representa- tive," Biden said in a statement.
Senator John Kerry, who was narrowly defeated by Bush in last year's election, struck a harsher tone, saying Bolton carries "baggage we cannot afford."
"I recognize John Bolton's long service to our country, but this is just about the most inexplicable appointment the president could make to represent the United States to the world community," Kerry said.
But conservatives argue there could be tremendous benefits for the US and UN with Bolton's presence in New York.
The recent scandal over the mismanagement of the Iraqi oil-for-food program may ease his acceptance in the diplomatic ranks.
"The price that the scandal has had on the United Nations has created a more reform-minded atmosphere in the organization and may make it more receptive to to what Bolton is trying to do," Schaefer said.
By naming Bolton, Schaefer said Bush is sending the same message to congressional conservatives as he is to the UN: that he is serious about reform. Reform advocates in Congress have been sceptical about US efforts to change the UN, and Bolton will bring a higher level of credibility when he's addressing the issue on Capitol Hill because of his long record of pushing for reform, Schaefer said.
He also said that just because Washington wants changes at the UN doesn't mean it opposes the organization or that it is unilateralist "as a first recourse."
"Conservatives want to reform the United Nations ... but not throw the baby out with the bathwater," he said.
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
RSS