China has warned Taiwan again. This time, China's rubber-stamp National People's Congress has passed an "anti-secession" law requiring Taiwan to surrender its sovereignty peacefully or face invasion.
This coercive act, which aims to bring the Taiwanese to their knees, unilaterally changes the status quo across the Taiwan Strait and constitutes a serious challenge to the US' Taiwan Relations Act.
That law requires the US government to act should such coercion be exercised against Taiwan. In the past three decades, the US' "one China" policy, a strategically ambiguous ploy, has successfully put the China-Taiwan dispute on the back burner and maintained peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait.
However, the antagonism between an increasingly dictatorial China and a vibrantly democratic Taiwan has endangered this fuzzy strategy. To avoid a showdown, the US should immediately re-examine its "one China" policy.
One way to deal with the problem is for the US to repeal its law, give up Taiwan and give in to China. The other way is for the US to reinforce the Taiwan Relations Act and accept the fact that Taiwan is a sovereign country and recognize it.
The latter is a just and moral choice that the US should adopt. Only then can the US make up for the tens of thousands of helpless Formosans who lost their lives to Chiang Kai-shek's (
Only then can Taiwan negotiate with China equally, peacefully and meaningfully. Otherwise, this dysfunctional ambiguity will result in the US and China taking a collision course.
The Taiwan issue will not go away. The US should accept its moral responsibility and face up to this relic conflict left by earlier generations. The choice is clear for the US. When it comes to freedom, democracy and liberty, there is no such thing as ambiguity.
Chi Yang
Ohio
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS