Under the intense gaze of the Taiwanese people, the meeting between President Chen Shui-bian (
Also, the legislature is controlled by the opposition, and believing that a name change could be passed would be to cheat both oneself and others. The language was clear, and Chen's compromise and retreat could be seen in his statements and actions, which amounted to accepting Soong's "one China" framework and pro-unification stance.
The immediate response from pro-independence Taiwanese both in Taiwan and abroad who think that the national title should be changed and a new constitution written was surprise and protest followed by public anger and attacks. Chen was taken aback.
Former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) said Chen had been taken by the demon he wanted to gain control of, that he lost his presidential stature by issuing a joint statement with Soong and that any comparison with his appointment of General Hau Pei-tsun (郝柏村) as premier was "crazy."
Senior presidential adviser Koo Kuang-ming (辜寬敏) resigned from his post in protest. National Policy Adviser and Chairman of World United Formosans for Independence Ng Chiau-tong (黃昭堂) said the consensus was nonsense. He said independence supporters had now been cheated by Chen three times, and that they would follow their own road from this point forward to avoid being cheated again.
The Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) issued a statement criticizing Chen for abandoning nation-building for the sake of reconciliation, saying it amounted to admitting defeat. TSU legislative caucus whip Lo Chih-ming (羅志明) said that "the joint statement means capitulating to the unificationists and giving into the `one China' concept." The party's Secretary-General Chen Chien-ming (陳建銘) said he felt "deceived," and that Chen is "a president who goes back on his promises."
Huang Chao-hung (黃昭弘), an elder in the Presbyterian Church in Taiwan, said that Chen offered Soong his sincerity in the form of a calligraphy painting, and wondered whether Chen "is sincere toward the people of Taiwan." But the best assessment came from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (連戰), when he said that "I even thought it was a KMT announcement.
The departure of stalwarts of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and other prominent figures has been a sharp warning to Chen and had a huge impact on the DPP. It has become a major problem, but these people are all intelligent political leaders who understand the overall picture.
If Chen patiently and sincerely explains his actions, there should still be a chance to save the situation. The heart of the problem is that -- ?beginning with the 228 Incident, through the "white terror" period and the tang wai movement, to the DPP's and Chen's accession to power -- the people of Taiwan have moved from a minority to a majority position politically, and from distrust and doubt to belief in and protection of Taiwan. They have come to understand, accept and support the idea that Taiwan is a sovereign and independent country, that the national title should be changed, and that a new constitution should be written.
Already, a majority of the Taiwanese people -- ?if not 75 percent then almost 60 percent -- accept and identify with these ideas, and many feel that no one but Chen should lead them toward the realization of this vision.
How cruel and how wrong it was of Chen to crush this dream of the Taiwanese people in his meeting with Soong.
Will they believe in Chen again, and will they believe in and vote for the DPP again?
Over the past few days, we have heard a lot of accusations and expressions of disappointment with Chen and the DPP, both within Taiwan and from abroad. The public is turning its back and supporters are walking away.
Chen danced with the wolf-like Soong in an attempt to build a legislative majority, pass the arms purchase and constitutional reform bills and achieve a breakthrough in the tense cross-strait relationship. In power politics, a risky gambit may win the game.
The problem is that Taiwan still isn't a regular democratic state. Sacrificing the principle of national sovereignty in the name of power politics is too high a price. Can Chen afford to pay it? This time, he clearly misread public opinion and forgot that it can either make or break him.
If he doesn't quickly do some damage control and return to the road toward Taiwanese sovereignty, Chen will lose this game and I predict that the DPP will be the loser in this year's National Assembly, county commissioner and city mayor elections, as well as the Kaohsiung mayoral election next year and even the presidential election in 2008.
Chiou Chwei-liang is a visiting professor at Tamkang University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
The Cabinet on Nov. 6 approved a NT$10 billion (US$318.4 million) four-year plan to build tourism infrastructure in mountainous areas and the south. Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) on Tuesday announced that the Ministry of Transportation and Communications would offer weekday accommodation discounts, birthday specials and other domestic travel incentives beginning next March, aiming to encourage more travel outside the usual weekend and holiday peaks. The government is right to focus on domestic tourism. Although the data appear encouraging on the surface — as total domestic trips are up compared with their pre-COVID-19 pandemic numbers — a closer look tells a different
For more than seven decades, the Chinese Communist Party has claimed to govern Tibet with benevolence and progress. I have seen the truth behind the slogans. I have listened to the silences of monks forbidden to speak of the Dalai Lama, watched the erosion of our language in classrooms, and felt the quiet grief of a people whose prayers are monitored and whose culture is treated as a threat. That is why I will only accept complete independence for Tibet. The so-called “autonomous region” is autonomous in name only. Decisions about religion, education and cultural preservation are made in Beijing, not
Apart from the first arms sales approval for Taiwan since US President Donald Trump took office, last month also witnessed another milestone for Taiwan-US relations. Trump signed the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act into law on Tuesday. Its passing without objection in the US Senate underscores how bipartisan US support for Taiwan has evolved. The new law would further help normalize exchanges between Taiwanese and US government officials. We have already seen a flurry of visits to Washington earlier this summer, not only with Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍), but also delegations led by National Security Council Secretary-General Joseph Wu
I recently watched a panel discussion on Taiwan Talks in which the host rightly asked a critical question: Why is the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China (IPAC) spearheading a robust global movement to reject China’s ongoing distortion of UN Resolution 2758? While the discussion offered some context, a more penetrating analysis and urgent development was missed. The IPAC action is not merely a political gesture; it is an essential legal and diplomatic countermeasure to China’s escalating and fundamentally baseless campaign to manufacture a claim over Taiwan through the deliberate misinterpretation of a 1971 UN resolution. Since the inauguration of Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) as
RSS