Ever since the tsunami ravaged the shores of a dozen nations washed by the Indian Ocean, Americans have been accused of being "stingy" in response -- an allegation that does not stand up in the glare of hard fact. \nDuring a visit to the stricken region, Secretary of State Colin Powell noted that a majority of the victims were in Islamic nations and hoped the American relief effort would "give the Muslim world and the rest of the world ... an opportunity to see American generosity, American values in action." \nThe criticism started with a senior UN official, Jan Egeland, who suggested that the US and other economically advanced nations had been "stingy" in their initial relief efforts. That assessment reverberated across Europe and Asia and the US itself. \nThe New York Times editorial-ized that US President George W. Bush's initial response was stingy, which generated an outpouring of letters agreeing and disagreeing. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution seemed to reflect other regional papers with a headline: "Do we give enough?" \nThe criticism continued even after the US relief mission got underway. A New York Times \ncolumnist, Nicholas Kristof, wrote: "When grieving victims intrude onto our TV screens, we dig into our pockets and provide the massive, heartwarming response that we're now displaying in Asia; the rest of the time, we're tightwads who turn away as people die in far greater numbers." \nNot so. \nEven before the tsunami, US individuals, foundations, and corporations gave US$238 billion in 2001 to churches, hospitals, medical research and other charities at home and abroad. That sum was up to US$241 billion in 2002 and 2003, according to the Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University. \nThose annual donations were larger that the GDPs of Norway, Denmark, Poland, or Saudi Arabia. Indeed, US private charitable donations would constitute the world's 21st largest economy. \nThis giving is encouraged as public policy, in contrast to many other nations, by laws that permit taxpayers to deduct charitable contributions from the income on which they pay taxes. That applies to aid for tsunami relief. \nWhat makes the shock of the tsunami more devastating than other natural or manmade horrors is that rolled from the eastern to the western edge of the vast Indian Ocean. The death toll of 155,000 and rising and the displacement of 3 million to 5 million survivors ex-ceeds the 100,000 who perished in the atomic bombing of Hiroshima in 1945 and the 139,000 who died in a 1991 typhoon in Bangladesh. \nOnce the extent of the tsunami's destruction had become evident, the US pledged US$350 million in relief assistance and deployed 20 warships and a Coast Guard ship across the Indian Ocean with 13,000 people aboard and ashore. \nCritics wondered aloud why the armed forces were employed but were quickly silenced when Marines landed to erect temporary shelters, engineers got water systems working, and medical specialists started treating the injured and starved. No one else could have done this. \nMost important, 46 US helicopters, the world's most versatile vehicles, started ferrying supplies from ship to shore and inland to survivors and carrying the injured and homeless to medical aid stations and shelters. The number of choppers is expected to rise to 90. \nThe cost to US taxpayers is hard to measure. The commander of US forces in the affected region, Admiral Thomas Fargo, could not give reporters in Washington an estimate but asserted: "The American taxpayers made an investment in a very solid and robust military capability that has a wide range of uses. And we're demonstrating the value of that investment today." \nBush has asked his father, former president George H.W. Bush, a Republican, and former president Bill Clinton, a Democrat, to lead private fundraising. That may have been politically astute but probably not necessary, as non-governmental relief organizations have reported an unmeasured flood of donations. \nAustralia, Japan, and Germany have pledged sizable sums, but China, which has been seeking to expand its influence in Asia, has promised only US$60 million and a medical team of 35 to Indonesia. \nOther Asian nations pledged lesser amounts. Islamic nations have not done much despite the suffering of Muslims. Oil-rich Saudi Arabia, believed to be funding Muslim terrorists, has pledged only US$10 million, while other Islamic nations have either put up lesser sums or have not been heard from. \nRichard Halloran is a journalist based in Hawaii.
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
At the end of last month, Paraguayan Ambassador to Taiwan Marcial Bobadilla Guillen told a group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators that his president had decided to maintain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, despite pressure from the Chinese government and local businesses who would like to see a switch to Beijing. This followed the Paraguayan Senate earlier this year voting against a proposal to establish ties with China in exchange for medical supplies. This constituted a double rebuke of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) diplomatic agenda in a six-month span from Taiwan’s only diplomatic ally in South America. Last year, Tuvalu rejected an
South China Sea exercises in July by two United States Navy nuclear-powered aircraft carriers reminds that Taiwan’s history since mid-1950, and as a free nation, is intertwined with that of the aircraft carrier. Eventually Taiwan will host aircraft carriers, either those built under its democratic government or those imposed on its territory by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN). By September 1944, a lack of sufficient carrier airpower and land-based airpower persuaded US Army and Navy leaders to forgo an invasion to wrest Taiwan from Japanese control, thereby sparing Taiwanese considerable wartime destruction. But two
As Taiwan is engulfed in worries about Chinese infiltration, news reports have revealed that power inverters made by China’s Huawei Technologies Co are used in the solar panels on the top of the Legislative Yuan’s Zhenjiang House (鎮江會館) on Zhenjiang Street in Taipei. However, what is even more worrying is that Taiwan’s new national electronic identification card (eID) has been subcontracted to the French security firm and eID maker Idemia, which has not only cooperated with the Chinese Public Security Bureau to manufacture eIDs in China, but also makes the new identification cards being issued in Hong Kong. There might be more