Long live revolutions
Jonathan Steele wrote an interesting article about democracy in Ukraine ("Democracy is too important to be brought about in this way," Jan. 3, page 9.) Unfortunately, he has a distorted view of the situation in Ukraine.
Steele might consider visiting the New Ukraine and getting a sense of the positive change the Orange Revolution has brought to 48 million Ukrainians who have risen up against corruption and a government that has systematically suppressed human rights and ordered the murder of a number of opposition leaders and journalists. It has systematically pillaged government coffers and served the interests of a few power brokers.
Steele's article suggests that democracy can be won in some smooth, negotiated fashion. That may be true when dealing with democratically elected governments. Outgoing president Leonid Kuchma's government was a sham and former prime minister Viktor Yanukovich's criminal record would preclude him from holding office in any government.
The Ukrainian Orange Revolution is a people's revolution, fought mostly by young Ukrainians who have had enough of a dozen years of "pseudo-democracy." Real democracy is their choice.
The only blood spilled in this revolution was by some of Yanukovich's allies committing suicide as they realized that they must pay the piper for their misdeeds. Other "pseudo-democracies" around the world (there are many) should take note: you could be next.
I support the Orange Revolution, and every citizen of the global village we live in should do the same. To do otherwise undermines everything democracy stands for. Let the Orange Revolution be one of many to come.
Yanukovich will be judged harshly by history. He and his quickly-disappearing team (some are committing suicide or hastily requesting diplomatic visas to leave the country) are yesterday's news, relegated to the trashheap of history. Opposition leader Viktor Yushchenko will do his part to move Ukraine forward in the new millennium.
He has unleashed the spirit of freedom in the Ukrainian people. Let his destiny unfold as he serves his people.
Eugene Roman
Toronto, Canada
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big