A senior US State Department official says that his decision not to talk to the Taipei Times because of its criticism of US Secretary of State Colin Powell in a Taipei Times editorial was his own, and not a decision of the department or the Bush administration. \nRandall Schriver, the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State in charge of China, Taiwan and Hong Kong, said, "It was a response from me personally." He added: "I didn't talk to anybody about it." \nThat resolved a question that was raised but which went unanswered when Schriver called the Washington correspondent of the Taipei Times to say he would not talk to the correspondent or the newspaper again because of the reference to Powell in the editorial. \nSchriver objected to the description of Powell in the editorial as "that sorry wreck of a once principled man." \nHe said he felt that description was "way over the top." \n"I have enormous respect for the man," Schriver said. "The editorial page is where the paper as an entity expresses its views. And if that's the position of the paper, then I personally have a big problem with it." \nSchriver said he was not objecting to the editorial as a whole, or to the policy issues raised by the editorial. \n"I was not responding to any policy statement, but what I regarded as a personal shot at the secretary," he said. \nThe editorial, entitled "US' Taiwan policy is in shambles," discussed recent statements by Powell and his deputy, Richard Armitage, which appeared to signal a major negative shift in Bush administration policy toward Taiwan in recent months. \nDuring that period, Powell said that the US' intention was for Taiwan's "reunification" with China. Earlier, after a lunch in Washington with Chinese Foreign Minister Li Zhaoxing (李肇星), he said -- inaccurately -- that "there is no support in the United States for an independence movement in Taiwan" because independence "would be inconsistent with our obligations and our commitment to our one-China policy." \nThe editorial also cited more recent statements by Armitage describing Taiwan as a "landmine" in US-China relations and asserting that "we all agree that there is but one China, and Taiwan is part of China." \nThe editorial pointed out that no US administration had said that before. \nArmitage also expressed the opinion that the US is under no obligation to come to Taiwan's aid if China attacked. \nWhile that is legally true under the Taiwan Relations Act, such a statement has for decades been anathema to US administrations and a violation of bedrock policies going back to US recognition of the Beijing government. \nCharles Snyder is the Taipei Times Washington correspondent.
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
At the end of last month, Paraguayan Ambassador to Taiwan Marcial Bobadilla Guillen told a group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators that his president had decided to maintain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, despite pressure from the Chinese government and local businesses who would like to see a switch to Beijing. This followed the Paraguayan Senate earlier this year voting against a proposal to establish ties with China in exchange for medical supplies. This constituted a double rebuke of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) diplomatic agenda in a six-month span from Taiwan’s only diplomatic ally in South America. Last year, Tuvalu rejected an
South China Sea exercises in July by two United States Navy nuclear-powered aircraft carriers reminds that Taiwan’s history since mid-1950, and as a free nation, is intertwined with that of the aircraft carrier. Eventually Taiwan will host aircraft carriers, either those built under its democratic government or those imposed on its territory by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN). By September 1944, a lack of sufficient carrier airpower and land-based airpower persuaded US Army and Navy leaders to forgo an invasion to wrest Taiwan from Japanese control, thereby sparing Taiwanese considerable wartime destruction. But two
As Taiwan is engulfed in worries about Chinese infiltration, news reports have revealed that power inverters made by China’s Huawei Technologies Co are used in the solar panels on the top of the Legislative Yuan’s Zhenjiang House (鎮江會館) on Zhenjiang Street in Taipei. However, what is even more worrying is that Taiwan’s new national electronic identification card (eID) has been subcontracted to the French security firm and eID maker Idemia, which has not only cooperated with the Chinese Public Security Bureau to manufacture eIDs in China, but also makes the new identification cards being issued in Hong Kong. There might be more