The onslaught of the winter Typhoon Nanmadol made everyone forget the intense legislative election campaign, as early warning and disaster prevention mechanisms were initiated in the hope of minimizing damage.
Although everyone agrees that "an ounce of prevention is better than a pound of cure," an oft forgotten principle is that making preparations even before the threat of a disaster has appeared is more important than strengthening preparations when a disaster is already approaching.
Winter typhoons are extremely rare. Are they the result of climate changes, or are they natural disturbances in weather patterns? The scientific community is still unable to determine this. If recent phenomena are a part of these changes, we may be too late if we wait for scientists to propose a concrete solution before we act.
The Kyoto Protocol, aimed at restricting industrialized nations' greenhouse gas emissions, will take effect on Feb. 16 -- 90 days after the UN received Russian President Vladimir Putin's signature on the agreement. The convention on climate change affects societies, environments, economies and even national defense and diplomatic relations. Despite the effects this important convention will have on Taiwan's future development, the government has treated it as a low priority.
After the Kyoto Protocol takes effect, international reductions and measures will be implemented. As Taiwan faces this "storm," the government should not simply choose to let things take their natural course.
Although scientists are still unable to clearly forecast the temporal and geographic extent of climate change, a majority agrees that if greenhouse gas emissions continue to increase, the climate will change, and it may become completely different from the current climate. Because we have no way of predicting the future, conservative hopes must not deviate too far from the current situation.
Scientists estimate that global greenhouse gas emissions should be reduced by 60 percent or more to keep concentration levels below 25 percent. The current stage of the Kyoto Protocol only requires an average reduction of 5.2 percent by 2010.
The main argument of those opposing immediate reductions is a lack of scientific evidence. But what they are really worried about is the costs of such reductions. If we consider the situation using a time-frame of 100 years, however, the benefits to future generations, ecology and socio-economic activities in reducing or eliminating greenhouse gas emissions are certain to outweigh the costs, and that is why such reductions should, and must, be carried out.
Doing this at an early stage will reduce the burden on future generations to carry out reductions, and that is why environmental activists unanimously demand immediate action.
Some members of government and industrial leaders, however, have differing opinions when it comes to the questions of how much, when and how reductions should be implemented, as well as how long it will be before costs are returned, and whether implementation of reductions will affect competitiveness, thus handing advantages to adversaries.
As a result of worries over future uncertainties and the possibility that the advantages of reductions will not appear immediately, little has actually been done.
Although there still is no conclusive scientific evidence that climate change will initiate an increase in adverse weather, 30 years of international insurance industry data show that losses caused by natural disasters have increased by between five and 10 times over the past 12 years. Even if we ignore the greenhouse effect, the government should be strict in its implementation of measures to minimize losses from natural disasters, just as it takes preventative action when a typhoon is nearing.
Some examples of this would be to prohibit development and cultivation in disaster-prone areas, encourage indigenous peoples to move to safe areas, strengthen education in disaster prevention and how to avoid exposing oneself to danger, carrying out an overall review of existing land programs, and to use legal and policy incentives to encourage the public to participate in soil, water and resource conservation measures.
The soon-to-take-effect Kyoto Protocol makes a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions even more unavoidable. Although Taiwan is not a signatory of the protocol, it cannot remain aloof. Nor can it rely on taking advantage of the actions of other countries.
The countries and industries of Europe and North America have on many occasions used international environmental treaties to set up trade barriers or prohibit environmentally unsafe products. These types of measures could seriously hurt an export-oriented economies like Taiwan.
Furthermore, when the Kyoto Protocol was written, most people were aware that reduction targets fell well short of what scientists were suggesting.
The hope, however, was that lower targets would attract the participation of more countries. The hope was also to use official measures to reduce questions regarding execution. In future, reduction targets will be expanded and the number of participating countries will increase. When most countries participate in reductions, the drawbacks for individual countries will decrease, and there will be even fewer opportunities for a free lunch.
Ninety-seven percent of Taiwan's energy is imported. Energy savings measures would not only decrease the use of foreign currency and a reliance on energy imports, it would also relieve the impact of fluctuations in international energy prices.
If many public institutions were to make small adjustments to their operations, many obvious results would follow, such as creating unambiguous and easily understood energy labels to allow consumers a choice, improving mass transportation and reducing energy needs and prioritizing the purchase of energy-saving products to point the way for manufacturing industries.
In addition, reusable energies such as wind power, solar power and landfill gas could create a more diverse energy system, offer more room for individual choice, and strengthen overall security of the energy system. Benefits would of course not be limited to the commercial sector.
Crisis can be an opportunity. International environmental agreements are becoming increasingly strict, and the need for fossil fuels is growing rapidly. This has already forced global energy prices to increase and made energy-saving methods and new energies more competitive.
The government should not only find ways of reducing losses from natural disasters, it should also promote energy-saving measures and develop reusable energy. It should also provide ample information to make the public understand the problems attached to a continued use of fossil fuels and allow industry enough time to prepare or even set up new industries.
Only by properly preparing itself can Taiwan be confident in handling the ever-changing international situation. The relationship between environmental protection and economic development has changed from one of opposition to one of mutual influence and growth. This understanding is a crucial link as Taiwan develops into an advanced country.
Gloria Hsu is a professor of atmospheric sciences at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
RSS