In this past legislative election, to clearly draw a line between the pan-green and pan-blue camp and to persuade moderate and undecided voters, President Chen Shui-bian (
In contrast to the pan-blue stance of amending the constitution and former president Lee Teng-hui's (
There is no consensus in political discourse as to whether democratization requires the enactment of a new constitution. In the post-communist era, more than twenty countries in Europe and Asia, excluding Russia and Yugoslavia, have all enacted a new constitution. They wanted to seize the fleeting and crucial moment to set up a constitution to show their determination to reform. The political structures of authoritarian rule were an impediment to democratization.
If we look at the constitutional reforms conducted by Lee throughout his tenure in office, we see that the transfer of power between political parties was the primary focal point of his reforms. This included the establishment of the wholly-elected legislature and the direct election of the president.
This was achieved without actually altering the government's structure under the Constitution. Although the changes were incremental, compromises in the face of political realities and political power struggles were often unavoidable.
Back then the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) faction in the legislature only sought to share political power as an opposition party and had no long-term policy for managing the country. So current attempts to operate under the Constitution as amended in 1997 only create an endless series of problems.
For the Constitution to truly belong to the 23 million people of this nation, it must meet two conditions: It has to be created with our own hands and it has to be tailored to our needs. The former is a symbolic proclamation to the world and the latter is necessary for greater political integration domestically. They both show the legitimacy and necessity of enacting a new Taiwan constitution.
Based on the principle of self-determination, everyone is free to decide one's own fate politically, economically, socially, and culturally. The current system of the country was grafted onto Taiwan by the regime of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) without the consent of the people.
Although the DPP government is trying to work within the administrative system of the Republic of China (ROC), the nature of the system remains unchanged. Enacting a new constitution displays determination, shows that we want to have a country of our own, and that we will utilize the redefinition of a country to confirm the sovereignty of Taiwan.
When the US questioned Chen on his "four noes" policy, Chen replied that Taiwan is currently like "a child wearing a grown man's clothes." He was referring to the fact that the Constitution is already an outdated and unsuitable one for Taiwan since it was established for the vast population of China.
Writing a new constitution can clarify the nation's direction and help augment the national identity of Taiwan's people. Through the process of establishing a constitution we can integrate the diverse ethnic groups by having all take part in the construction of the country.
Shih Cheng-feng is an associate professor of public administration at Tamkang University.
Translated by Daniel Cheng
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
RSS