An international panel last week officially presented a blueprint to overhaul the UN as it reaches age 60 next year, proposing sweeping changes but also keeping core concepts, including the right to self-defence which could include pre-emptive acts.
\nPre-emptive policies have become a controversial issue after US President George W. Bush launched the war against Iraq on allegations -- later proved untrue -- that former president Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction and presented a threat to the world.
\nA deeply divided UN Security Council refused to back the invasion last year, but the new proposals from a 16-member blue ribbon panel appeared to offer a framework where such pre-emptive actions would be allowed as long as they are defensive acts and have the backing of the council.
\nThe panel's blueprint for reform, commissioned by UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, was unveiled formally to the 191 members of the organization on Thursday, after parts of the report were released earlier last week.
\nAnnan said rules governing use of force remain "at the heart of who we are as the UN and what we stand for. I cannot overemphasize how important a new consensus on this issue is for a renewed system of collective security."
\nThe panel reaffirmed the right of governments to self-defence, including pre-emptive action when an attack is imminent and in cases combining terrorist and nuclear attacks, which it called "nightmare scenarios."
\nBut it said the UN Security Council must act swiftly and more proactively than in the past.
\nThe panel left unchanged Article 51 of the UN Charter, which essentially supports the inherent individual or collective rights of self-defense against an armed attack.
\n"The panel did not discuss the war in Iraq and made no characterization about its nature" when it drafted the blueprint, Sebastian Einsiedel told reporters. He is part of a team of researchers for the reform package.
\n"We do not pass judgement on legitimacy of war, we just urged the Security Council to be proactive," he said.
\nThe blueprint will provide the basis for discussions over the coming year, and recognized the difficulty of changing such a large and complex organization by warning that not all the 101 recommendations for change would be accepted, including proposed new models for the 15-nation council.
\nThe panel broadened the
\nscope of threats in today's world
\nto include infectious disease,
\nHIV/AIDS and poverty as well as weapons of mass destruction, and proposed a new collective security consensus that would put an expanded UN Security Council in charge of peace and security in the world.
\n"I wholly endorse its core arguments for a broader, more comprehensive system of collective security: one that tackles both new and old threats, and addresses the security concerns of all states -- rich and poor, weak and strong," Annan said upon receiving the blueprint.
\nThe commission, named the High Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change, was headed by former Thai prime minister Anand Panyarachun and spent more than a year to develop the 93-page blueprint, entitled A more secure world: Our shared responsibility.
\nIts members included former heads of government like Gro Harlem Brundtland of Norway, Gareth Evans of Australia and Yevgeny Primakov of Russia, security experts like Brent Scowcroft of the US and former Chinese foreign minister Qian Qichen (
South China Sea exercises in July by two United States Navy nuclear-powered aircraft carriers reminds that Taiwan’s history since mid-1950, and as a free nation, is intertwined with that of the aircraft carrier. Eventually Taiwan will host aircraft carriers, either those built under its democratic government or those imposed on its territory by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN). By September 1944, a lack of sufficient carrier airpower and land-based airpower persuaded US Army and Navy leaders to forgo an invasion to wrest Taiwan from Japanese control, thereby sparing Taiwanese considerable wartime destruction. But two
This year, India and Taiwan can look back on 25 years of so-called unofficial ties. This provides an occasion to ponder over how they can deepen collaboration and strengthen their relations. This reflection must be free from excitement and agitation caused by the ongoing China-US great power jostling as well as China’s aggressive actions against many of its neighbors, including India. It must be based on long-term trends in bilateral engagement. To begin with, India and Taiwan, thus far, have had relations constituted by various activities, but what needs to be thought about now is whether they can transform their ties
As Taiwan is engulfed in worries about Chinese infiltration, news reports have revealed that power inverters made by China’s Huawei Technologies Co are used in the solar panels on the top of the Legislative Yuan’s Zhenjiang House (鎮江會館) on Zhenjiang Street in Taipei. However, what is even more worrying is that Taiwan’s new national electronic identification card (eID) has been subcontracted to the French security firm and eID maker Idemia, which has not only cooperated with the Chinese Public Security Bureau to manufacture eIDs in China, but also makes the new identification cards being issued in Hong Kong. There might be more
All lives eventually come to an end. Over the years, my friendship with former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) had its ups and downs. Lee’s passing was a heavy blow and has left me deeply saddened. We experienced a lot together and the memories have come flooding back. Lee was born several months earlier than me. During World War II, he was studying at Kyoto Imperial University, but halfway through his studies, he was forced to change his name and enter military service. I was studying at Tokyo Imperial University, but went into hiding to avoid military service, and I was later