The US and Japan are engaged in the most far-reaching deliberations about their alliance since they revised their mutual security treaty in 1960 -- discussions that envision a greatly enhanced role for Japan in the common defense.
A revitalized US-Japan alliance is certain to draw objections from China, with which both the US and Japan have prickly relations, and from North Korea, which may have acquired nuclear arms and once threatened Japan and US forces in Asia with a "nuclear sea of fire."
The prospect of a stronger US-Japan alliance has alarmed South Korea, from which the US plans to withdraw one-third of its 37,000 troops there. Koreans complain that the US is reducing its commitment to South Korea in favor of expanded relations with Japan, which most Koreans still dislike even though Japan's harsh occupation of Korea ended 60 years ago.
These US-Japan negotiations didn't start with a fundamental revision of security relations in mind. Rather, they have evolved as the consequence of two separate but converging movements, one in the US, the other in Japan.
Under President George W. Bush, the US has begun a worldwide realignment of military forces to make them more flexible and effective in responding to contingencies. In Japan and Korea, that means eliminating outdated headquarters and consolidating operational controls into a new command arrangement in Japan.
Under Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi, Japan is in the midst of a searching debate on security that has been illuminated by a commission headed by a prominent business executive, Hiroshi Araki of Tokyo Electric Power. The commission has called on Japan to forge an "integrated security strategy" through "strategic consultations" with the US.
American officials said that, once they started talking with the Japanese about US deployments in Asia, it became apparent that both governments needed to agree on a "strategic context" before deciding on headquarters, troop dispositions and base issues.
The architect of the realignment, Under Secretary of Defense Douglas Feith, calls the prospective changes a "combined transformation." In Tokyo to continue the negotiations, he told reporters, "we are going to have increased capability to work with Japan on security concerns that directly relate to Japan," whether in Asia or elsewhere.
closer ties
Among US military leaders, an advocate of closer US-Japan security coordination is Lieutenant General Wallace Gregson, former commander of US Marine forces in Japan and now commander of all Marine forces in the Pacific. He has spent more time posted in Japan than many top US officers.
In response to a query, Gregson noted: "I have advocated in the past greater combined training for our forces, combined operations where appropriate, and even combined basing."
At his headquarters in Hawaii, he said: "I think we're on the first step of a period of unprecedented cooperation and collaboration between our two nations."
Feith, the Pentagon's number three official, said a US objective in repositioning forces was to make contingency plans more timely. Moving the Army's First Corps headquarters from the state of Washington to Camp Zama, southwest of Tokyo, would put it in the region in which it would operate.
The US already has the Third Marine Expeditionary Force headquarters in Okinawa, will consolidate an aviation command at the Fifth Air Force in Yokota, west of Tokyo, and has the Seventh Fleet headquarters in Yokosuka, south of Tokyo. Having those commands relatively close to one another is intended to improve joint war planning and operations.
Asked about South Korean anxieties, Feith said: "They are not being neglected."
US forces remaining in South Korea will not only help to defend South Korea but will be available for contingencies elsewhere. Feith asserted that having American troops locked into any country in which they are based "just doesn't make any sense."
"The American people cannot afford separate armies, separate armed forces for South Korea, for Japan, and for every other country where we might be located," he contended. Other officials said, however, that dismantling the command structure in Seoul set up during the Korean War would be delayed to assuage Korean fears.
Whether the US-Japan discussions would result in a new document was not clear even though the Araki commission recommended that Japan and the US devise a fresh "Joint Declaration on Security" and revise defense guidelines drawn up in 1997.
Feith said that had not been decided. He said the US-Japan security treaty "provides a reasonable degree of flexibility the way well-written treaties tend to do."
Even so, he left open the possibility that it could be reinterpreted or revised.
Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention. If it makes headlines, it is because China wants to invade. Yet, those who find their way here by some twist of fate often fall in love. If you ask them why, some cite numbers showing it is one of the freest and safest countries in the world. Others talk about something harder to name: The quiet order of queues, the shared umbrellas for anyone caught in the rain, the way people stand so elderly riders can sit, the
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
Small and medium enterprises make up the backbone of Taiwan’s economy, yet large corporations such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) play a crucial role in shaping its industrial structure, economic development and global standing. The company reported a record net profit of NT$374.68 billion (US$11.41 billion) for the fourth quarter last year, a 57 percent year-on-year increase, with revenue reaching NT$868.46 billion, a 39 percent increase. Taiwan’s GDP last year was about NT$24.62 trillion, according to the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, meaning TSMC’s quarterly revenue alone accounted for about 3.5 percent of Taiwan’s GDP last year, with the company’s
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
RSS